> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://goodoil.news/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# If They Don’t Know This, They Shouldn’t Be Here
- URL: https://goodoil.news/if-they-dont-know-this-they-shouldnt-be-here/
- Published: 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Description: Didn’t this migrant rapist even read the pamphlets?
- Author: Lushington Brady
- Tags: AUS Politics, Crime, Immigration

For a government that blatherskites about ‘social cohesion’ so much, Labor seem hell-bent on importing millions of people with Neanderthal social ideas several centuries removed from even the most Australian values. Ideas like, oh I don’t know: *rape is not acceptable*. Yet, having imported these priapic, knuckle-dragging savages, Australian authorities continually indulge their barbarian mentalities.

Such as a judge refusing to jail a grotesque migrant thug whose “first sexual experience” was violently raping an Australian girl within months of creeping into our shores. Literally, on the grounds that ‘he didn’t know rape wasn’t acceptable in Australia’.

I wish I was making that up. Maybe someone should have [given him a pamphlet](https://goodoil.news/if-they-have-to-be-taught-this-stuff-they-dont-belong-here/) or something.

> [A 16-year-old boy](https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9364052/teenage-boy-sentenced-in-canberra-court-for-house-party-rape/?ref=goodoil.news) who raped a girl he met at a house party “used considerable force in pursuit of his own sexual gratification,” a judge has said.

Or, to strip away the judicial soft-soap, he’s a violent rapist. Never mind, says the judge: he can just go and pick up litter for a year or so. That’ll teach him.

> In an ACT Supreme Court decision published on Tuesday, October 6, the rapist was handed an 18-month prison sentence, suspended upon him entering into a good behaviour order. This means his sentence will be served in the community, rather than behind bars.

Let’s go over what this scum did: “he ripped open her clothing and sexually assaulted her multiple ways”. This was all while she was crying and telling him to stop. He also refused to let her answer her continually ringing mobile phone: so we can add kidnapping to his violent rape.

> In a victim impact statement, she described feeling a loss of dignity, confidence and sense of self.  
>  
> She said she “can no longer call \[her\] body \[her\] own” and that night her life was stolen and would forever be changed.

Just lie back and think of the diversity, says the judge.

> In determining the sentence, \[Justice **Andrew Muller**\] accepted the teenager’s prior lack of sexual experience and “limited insight into societal norms in Australia” reduced his moral culpability.

Hands up who thinks ‘I didn’t know rape was wrong in Australia’ is more than sufficient grounds for instant deportation?

If you think this sort of judicial insouciance in the face of migrant rape culture is an aberration, consider the late, unlamented **Ali Jafarri**. This Afghan predator came to Australia as a ‘refugee’, and immediately proceed to repeatedly try to molest and abduct children. Stunningly, after his second offence, when he tried to walk off with a four-year-old girl, a typically tilty-headed judge let him off, scot-free, on the grounds that ‘he didn’t realise raping children is unacceptable in Australia’. Thankfully, for Australia’s little boys and girls, Jaffari offed himself in immigration detention, after his *third* offence.

Still, there’s plenty more rapey migrants where he came from, as Britain is discovering.

> [Nearly all women](https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16183281/Nearly-women-try-reach-UK-small-boats-raped-journey-home-secretary-says.html?ref=goodoil.news) who attempt to reach the UK in small boats from northern France are raped on their journey, according to the Home Secretary.

Now, this isn’t some ‘far-right’ Reform politician: it’s the Pakistani Muslim Labour Home Secretary. Yet, even as she admits that “every woman that’s in the north of France has probably been raped along the journey”, and “some of the men too”, she steadfastly refuses to draw the obvious conclusion:

*Britain is being swamped by Muslim and African rapists.*

Oh, no: the *real* problem, according to **Shabana Mahmood**, is indigenous Britons who don’t want millions of rapists flooding into their country.

> ‘So let’s just be really clear about who and what they are. They don’t think I’m a true Brit and they hate the fact that I’m a Muslim.’

And…?

> She added that she considered herself part of the ‘pro-Palestine cause’ and said she felt ‘very uncomfortable’ over the arrests of activists opposing the ban imposed on Palestine Action.

Read that part again: she admits to supporting the terrorists in Gaza, and backs supporters of the *proscribed violent terrorist group* ‘Palestine Action’.

So, when she says, in relation to said terrorist group, “You’ve got to be able to apply your principles… when it’s something you, you know, with your whole heart, are feeling very passionately about,” Britons are entitled to ask just what her principles are. Because, apparently she feels very passionate about supporting proscribed terrorists.

---

💡

****If you enjoyed this article please share it using the share buttons at the top or bottom of the article.**