> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://goodoil.news/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # Someone Does Something in Norway - URL: https://goodoil.news/someone-does-something-in-norway/ - Published: 2021-10-16T03:00:00.000Z - Updated: 2021-10-15T08:45:36.000Z - Author: Cam Slater - Tags: Media, NZ, World, #wp, #wp-post, #Import 2024-07-17 01:31 Reading the media with a critical eye (as you should: even us) means not only analysing what they say, but noticing what they **don’t**. Even the mainstream media rarely straight-out make things up (although they **are** becoming more and more brazen). Most often, they lie by omission: leaving out vital information that can change an entire “narrative”. This is especially true in crime, most particularly terrorism. For instance, how often have the media in Australia reported crimes by “youths”, leaving out the key descriptor: “of African appearance”. Similarly, NZ media [reporting local attacks on Asian people](https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/433333/police-investigate-shocking-attack-on-rotorua-hot-pools-visitors?ref=goodoil.news) mostly refer only to “a man”, “group of men”, or “a large family”. They’re not always so backwards about coming forward, though. The NZ media seemed [quite happy to report](https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/racist-attack-on-japanese-brother-and-sister-near-christchurch-park/S45UWVBKM5YMP4SRBJZMNDXE7E/?ref=goodoil.news) when a suspect was “of European appearance”, or drop slighting references to “ Pakeha”. This strongly suggests that the other attackers weren’t “of European appearance” — and why the media don’t want to tell us that. This brings us to the latest terror attack in Europe (until next week’s one, which almost certainly won’t even make the news here). **“Danish man suspected of killing five in bow-and-arrow attack in Norway,”** says *Reuters*. Other news services almost invariably described the attacker as a “Danish citizen”. Even Twitter’s trending news stuck to the “Danish national” line. Locally, *Newshub* likewise jumped on the “Danish citizen” bandwagon. Their lede ran, “**A Danish citizen in his thirties** has been arrested and charged following a vicious attack with a bow and arrows in the Norwegian town of Kongsberg which killed five people and injured two.” Hmm. Just any old Danish citizen, then? No clue as to motive or any ideological or religious affiliation? Nope. Zip. Nada. But, just to slant suspicion, *Newshub* goes out of its way to remind its readers about “far-right extremist **Anders Behring Breivik**”. And that, as far as *Newshub* seems to be concerned, is all you need to know. No other updates appear to have been filed, at the time of writing. It’s a similar story, over at **Stuff**. Their [first report referred only](https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/300430013/assailant-with-bow-and-arrows-kills-five-people-in-norway?rm=a&ref=goodoil.news) to **“A 37-year-old Danish man”**. To damn them with faint praise, [their second report](https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/300430911/norway-bowandarrow-rampage-appears-to-be-act-of-terror-authorities-say?ref=goodoil.news), the next day, dropped a key piece of information — way down in its **tenth** paragraph. This is odd because, in their **second** paragraph, they give quite a lot of detail about the suspect: “Police identified the attacker as **Espen Andersen Braathen**, a 37-year-old Danish citizen”. Is that all there is? Why, no! If any readers actually bothered scrolling down through a whole bunch of filler, they might eventually spot this little throwaway: > Regional Police Chief **Ole B Saeverud** described the man as being known as a Muslim convert and said there “earlier had been worries of the man having been radicalised”, but he did not elaborate or say why he was previously flagged or authorities did in response. > > [Stuff](https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/300430911/norway-bowandarrow-rampage-appears-to-be-act-of-terror-authorities-say?ref=goodoil.news) Did you blink and miss it? **Muslim convert.** “Worries of the man having been radicalised.” Now, why didn’t *Stuff* put that right up front with the rest of their description? It’s almost like they didn’t want you to know. In fact, you have to turn to wicked, right-wing Sky News to find out a whole lotta stuff that the other media seem reluctant to tell you. > Police said the suspect had been convicted several times in the past and confirmed that he had converted to Islam. > > He was given a six-month restraining order against two family members last year – believed to be his parents – after refusing to leave their house and threatening to kill one of them. > > In December 2017, a concerned friend also flagged up videos that Braathen had put online, reported the *Aftenposten* newspaper. > > Looking into the camera, he’s said to have confirmed he was a Muslim and described himself as a “messenger” with a “warning”, adding that “the time has come”. > > [Sky](https://news.sky.com/story/espen-andersen-braathen-what-we-know-so-far-about-suspected-norway-bow-and-arrow-killer-12433780?ref=goodoil.news) Now, if that wealth of detail is available to Sky in a story filed nearly three hours before Stuff’s last report, what was to stop the intrepid investigative newshounds on the team of $55 million picking it up? As **Mark Steyn** [once wrote](https://www.steynonline.com/7406/the-airbrush-is-mightier-than-the-sword?ref=goodoil.news), the airbrush is mightier than the sword. **Please share this article so that others can discover *The BFD***