Skip to content

$1.1 Million for Drag Story Time?

NZ bureaucrats really know how to spend a buck!

Photo by Alexander Grey / Unsplash

Matua Kahurangi
Protector of whakapapa. Hunter, fisher, kaitiaki of the whenua. Staunch supporter of the Treaty Principles Bill.

In November 2024, performer George Fowler, also known by the stage name “Hugo Grrl”, received $1.1 million in public funding to produce an eight-episode series of drag story time performances aimed at children. The series is set to air on TVNZ later this year, raising significant debate among various segments of the public.

Taxpayers have voiced concerns about whether public funds should be used for performances of this nature, particularly given the intended child audience. Some point to the involvement of political leaders, who are seen as advocates for drag performances in educational and public settings. This, the public argue, may have contributed to the approval of funding for such projects.

Adding to the controversy, Fowler reportedly received additional funding from Creative NZ in 2023 to conduct live story time performances in primary schools and libraries across New Zealand. Some members of the public have expressed discomfort with the concept, raising questions about age-appropriateness and whether this aligns with community values – especially coming from someone who is a self-described slut.

While there are strong opinions on both sides, religious and social groups like Destiny Church and its leader, Brian Tamaki, have taken a prominent stance in opposition to these events. Tamaki has characterized the performances as harmful and inappropriate for children and has vowed to push back against such initiatives.

Supporters of drag story-time performances argue that they promote inclusivity, diversity, and creativity. They emphasize that the events are carefully designed to be age appropriate and foster a positive message of self-expression and acceptance.

Public funding decisions, especially those involving children’s programs – should be transparent and open to scrutiny, allowing the community to feel confident in how taxpayer money is allocated.

This article was originally published on the author’s Substack.

Latest