Table of Contents
Dr. Guy David Hatchard
Guy is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He received his undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex and his Ph.D. in Psychology from Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield Iowa. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. His published work uses the statistical methods of the physical sciences to analyse social data.
A group of Scottish medicos are calling for the reintroduction of mask wearing in mid-summer. They’re worried, but why? After three and half years and the largest government expenditure on a single issue outside of wartime, nothing appears to have been resolved, and worse, it’s getting worse.
It is not so much that Covid is here to stay. We knew that from the start, coronaviruses don’t disappear they just become milder, rather excess deaths appear to be here to stay. That is a very difficult issue for anyone to spin, but almost everyone is trying very hard to do so.
Tomorrow, Radio New Zealand launches a seven-part multimedia presentation entitled ‘Under Current—Misinformation in Aotearoa‘. The images and voices in the trailer denigrate those raising questions about Covid policy, whose sole purpose is erroneously described in the podcast as orchestrating an ‘all out attack on the heart of democracy’.
The problem with this absurd suggestion is the fact that questions about drug safety do not in any way amount to disinformation or political anarchy—in reality, it is RNZ who is proving the unreliable narrator stoking division.
Hiding side effects has become stock in trade for the pharmaceutical industry. You might have read a headline this morning which shouted out to us New Alzheimer’s wonder drug ‘can slow disease progression by 60pc’,
but it does not.
Overall just 22% of trial participants showed improvements, and the improvements were so minor (just 2% improvement on the Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale of 144 measures), that relatives may not be able to notice them. Weigh this minuscule gain against the 37% of trial participants who suffered brain bleeds as a result of the medication. Ouch! Three people died as a result of the treatment.
The Alzheimer’s drug is supposed to work by attacking amyloid plaque in the brain, however, recent research suggests this may not be the main cause of Alzheimer’s, as this article investigates: “Seminal Alzheimer’s study claiming memory-robbing disease was caused by build-up of protein in brain may have been MANIPULATED, damning investigation claims”.
Questions about drug safety have to be asked, it’s just a normal matter, and that does not amount to spreading misinformation or undermining democracy. Especially when concerns are backed up by scientific papers and the government’s own data. The word ‘democracy’ means that everyone should have a say in government.
What is the end goal of the heightened rhetoric in the RNZ piece? What exactly are they hoping to achieve? How did we end up so far from our cultural roots?
You get the picture, don’t you? We are facing an industry that is determined to sell drugs to governments and equally determined to hide how ineffective and dangerous they are. This is being helped along by a willing and thoughtless media.
Modern drugs have become more dangerous because they are designed to edit processes automatically controlled by DNA. None more so than Covid mRNA and adenovirus vaccines, which invade cells and alter genetic functions. These powerful genetic vaccines have side effects whose invasive extent surpasses any previous drugs. There is a fine line between a life-changing drug and a life-threatening drug. We appear to have crossed that line.
In his book ‘The Body Illustrated’, Bill Bryson, after exhaustively consulting the great and famous about DNA, concludes “How all this works in detail is still largely a mystery to us”. Wise words. The extent of that mystery is now becoming clear, much of what little we thought we knew is now known to be false.
The problem here is not minor. It involves human life, longevity, ability, and continuity. Genetic and epigenetic alterations are inherited. This is well known to science. Altering something so absolutely vital as our genetics without fully understanding how it actually works is beyond foolish. It appears to be killing people and threatens generations to come.
Medical orthodoxy entered into the pandemic with an absolute faith in vaccination strategies, yet this now appears to be incompatible with the actual outcomes of pandemic policies and interventions. This has created an almost schizophrenic atmosphere of fear and a conflict mentality illustrated by the violent images inappropriately used in the RNZ trailer.
None of this does justice to what is essentially a scientific question—are Covid vaccines safe? There is a lot of finger pointing and, especially here in New Zealand, a lot of denial, but there appear to be no answers on offer except a tired refrain to vax and vax again.
Dr. Victoria Male at Imperial College wishes to support an advisory for mothers-to-be to have boosters during pregnancy, yet she admits that “we don’t have all the evidence yet”. There is a lot of evidence. You can review the frightening Pfizer trial data on pregnant women here and reflect on the record rates of stillbirths and miscarriages here.
Dr. Male’s comments illustrate the level of paradoxical thinking that seems to have gripped the medical community in the face of rising rates of illness and death. It is becoming clearer by the week that something has gone terribly wrong, yet many are becoming more strident in their refusal to countenance facts. Yesterday Dr Siouxsie Wiles attempted to make ‘refusing to engage in debate’ a virtue in her bewildering opinion piece for Stuff.
Contrast Dr Wiles’s stance with the more open balanced viewpoint of epidemiologist Dr. Vinay Prasad in his substack “Public Health Should Lose Your Trust”. Dr. Prasad is not an anti-vaxxer by any stretch of the imagination, and he recognises that public trust and drug safety relies on good research. He bemoans the absence of mainstream debate during the pandemic.
So How Do You Resolve the Issue of Vaccine Safety if Refusal to Answer Questions is Held Up as a Virtue?
The solution is really very, very simple, ridiculously so. There are crucial scientific tests of causality which will ultimately reveal responsibility. When light arriving from distant stars was measured and found to be bent by the sun’s gravity, critics of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity were silenced.
A year ago, it became clear that repeated Covid vaccination was associated with higher Covid death rates. Your chance of dying with Covid is greatly enhanced if you have had a booster, official data graphed below that our government, medical tsars, and paid media never publicly discuss.
Forget all the high-sounding moral coercion, fear mongering, obscure scientific jargon and PR hype designed to manipulate us. It’s dangerous. Instead, record vax status on death certificates and compare the death rate of the unvaccinated to the vaccinated. Governments and medical authorities have done the opposite. They have failed to publish this data. Now why would they do that? By hiding information, are they protecting democracy or undermining it? Are they using or misusing science? Are they serving the public or deceiving them?
