Table of Contents
Here’s one that wasn’t on my 2026 bingo card: a feminist website and a neo-Nazi website finding themselves on the same page. What’s brought two such unlikely bedfellows together? Yet another in the lost list of cases in point for my long-running call for judicial responsibility laws.
In this particular case, another upper-middle-class, middle-age, white, female judge getting her knickers all steamed up over a black rapist.
So … ah. It’s 2026. And a judge – a female one at that – has just described a rapist as *** check notes for precise quote ****: ‘ …this wonderful young man with a very bright future who has worked very hard to get to where he is’.
Nope. Not America. Not Afghanistan. Australia. Australia. Australia. Australia.
I kid you fucking not (and look I am not toning the language down on this).
And I don’t blame the author one bit for her intemperate language.
In June 2024, he targeted a 20-year-old woman on a nightclub dancefloor. While she was out with her friends, he lured her away, dragged her to a dark embankment near Queens Park, pinned her down on the ground, tore off her clothes, and raped her despite her pleas for him to stop. Her life was destroyed. She would later say that the attack left her in a constant state of terror. Her family gave statements explaining that they too have been traumatised from watching her suffer.
And just what kind of sentence did this ‘wonderful young’ rapist who so charmed Her Honour, get?
A Sudanese refugee will spend just two years behind bars for the brutal rape of a young woman in Queensland after [Toowoomba District Court Judge Dzenita Balić] called him a “wonderful young man”.
This, despite the airhead judge wittering that “the offence of rape is one of the most serious offences in the criminal code”.
So, sentence him appropriately, then.
Or does she have something of an apprehended bias, here? Judge Balić came to Australia as a Bosnian refugee. “Balić” is a Muslim name, derived from Turkish and Arabic roots.
Is she just looking after the ummah, ahead of the infidels?
Defence barrister Frank Martin asked the court to take into account during sentencing Angui’s childhood in Sudan, and said his client came to Australia at age 15 with no English language skills and a minimal amount of formal education, but graduated high school as a prefect and gained citizenship in 2024.
And celebrated by raping a young woman having a night out with her friends.
Such a ‘wonderful young man’.
But it’s not just Aussie women who have to live in fear of these ‘wonderful young men’.
A Sudanese refugee who was jailed for less than five years over the fatal bashing and stabbing of a teenager in a Victorian town has been spared deportation because he has lived in Australia most of his life.
Abraham Abas, 23, was among four men who chased down and killed Nicholas Henry, 18, in Morwell in 2021, and pleaded guilty to manslaughter after his murder charge was downgraded because one assailant was never identified and it could not be proven who delivered the eight fatal stab wounds.
This should be a no-brainer: a non-citizen who murders an Australian citizen? Back to bloody Sudan for you.
Enter the tilty-headed bureaucrats.
Abas’s refugee visa was cancelled in 2024, but Abas appealed the cancellation in a two-day hearing at the Administrative Review Tribunal in December, and on Wednesday the tribunal revoked the cancellation.
The tribunal ruled that although Abas failed the character test, posed a risk of reoffending, and would be expected to be deported by the community, these factors were outweighed by the strength, nature and duration of his ties to Australia, the best interests of his five minor relatives, and the risk of harm if he was sent to Sudan.
Well, guess what? I. Don’t. Care.
While sentencing Abas in 2023, Justice Jane Dixon told him: “I accept that the risk of deportation and separation from your family weighs heavily on your mind.”
Oh, surprise, surprise: another upper-middle-class, middle-age, white, female judge.
