This Is a Litany of Excuses
In the face of this report, the best response the government could make is to defund the Salvation Army for being part of the problem.
In the face of this report, the best response the government could make is to defund the Salvation Army for being part of the problem.
No, the benefit itself isn’t causal. It’s the lifestyle the benefit enables that does the damage. When will a future government recognise and act on this reality?
We mere mortals can picture the adult histories and households that bring newborns into precarious environments BUT officials have the confirming data. Is it acted on? No.
If being born onto welfare and staying there long-term is a risky business for children, why would any government want to encourage this?
The reality is this: it is cruel and callous to incentivise the birth of otherwise unwanted children. And it is a cruel and callous person who produces a child purely for their own monetary gain.
At 411,012 in October 2025, New Zealand has the highest absolute number of beneficiaries ever.
If you thought the public service was going to look or behave any differently under a National government, you will be disappointed. Indications are that the propagandist public service is just marking time till a left-wing administration is restored.
The welfare system has evolved from providing a safety net for those genuinely unable to provide for themselves to offering an alternative lifestyle to paid employment.
Reform can’t wait for who looks the part and how ‘kind’ it will be. It’s urgent. Now.
Welfare is like an iceberg. The visible tip gets all the attention – the young and unemployed. But below the surface is a very large group of people for whom welfare is a way of life – whether they chose it or not.
As policies go, it’s a plus, but barely positive and would rate a one out of 10 in the overall need for real welfare reform.
If ethnicity trumps humanity, all we face is a future filled with conflict.
Can we expect that as Asian values become more prevalent we will see less tolerance for people who make benefit dependency a lifelong habit? I hope so.
The more the state does, the more the state is expected to do.
In this judge’s application of the law, the very clear message the ban is meant to send has been muddied and weakened.
Whether tribalism is along gender or ethnic lines, it discourages, if not extinguishes, freedom of thought and speech.