Bludging, Breeding Criminals: What Labor Is Importing

When new Liberal party leader Angus Taylor released the coalition’s updated immigration policy, the chattering left erupted with predictable spittle-flecked fury. ‘A return to the white Australia policy!’ they screeched, which seems a curious admission, given that Taylor specifically referred to “migrants of subversive intent”. Are the chatterers saying that all non-whites are subversive?

Once again, the left just can’t help wearing their own deep-rooted racism on their sleeves.

But is Taylor right in arguing that not all migrants are equally valuable or useful to the country? Is he right to suggest that people from certain regions are more likely to be a burden, if not outright inimical, to the interests of Australia?

As it happens, the Danes investigated exactly this question, a decade ago – what they found offers a frightening insight to just how, for instance, Albanese’s rush to import thousands of ‘Palestinians’ is going to work out.

During 1990–91, hundreds of ‘Palestinian’ ‘refugees’ flooded into Denmark, claiming ‘persecution’ in Lebanon. In a farce eerily reminiscent of the Tampa affair in Australia a decade later, the Danish ‘refugee’ lobby went full pathological-empathy. When, as assessment duly found, the ‘Palestinians’ were not refugees at all, the grifting scumbags promptly occupied a church, with the full co-operation of the suicidally deluded priest. The usual gaggle of ‘Refugee Friends’ and other leftist radicals successfully pressured the government into granting asylum to the freeloaders.

This, despite the fact that 97 per cent of the ‘persecuted’ ‘asylum seekers’ had travelled back and forth between Denmark and both Lebanon and Syria, even as they were claiming asylum.

A long-term study by the Danish government tracked the outcomes of this collective idiocy. As any fool could have predicted, it was an illustrative example of precisely why no Middle Eastern country is suicidal enough to let ‘Palestinians’ slither in.

Of the original 321 Palestinian asylum seekers granted entry in 1992, 64 per cent (204) ended up with criminal convictions. Fully a quarter were criminal enough to merit prison sentences. This compares to just 0.07 per cent of Danes.

In other words, the ‘Palestinians’ were 315 times more likely to go to prison than Danes.

Fifty-five per cent of the ‘asylum seekers’ were on welfare, which is 15 times the rate of native Danes.

Astonishingly, though, three-quarters of these freeloading criminals were granted Danish citizenship.

The children – and there were a lot of them: nearly three times the fertility rate of native Danes – fared little better. Thirty-four per cent were convicted of crimes and 37 per cent were on welfare.

So, thanks to the tilty-head left, Denmark has burdened itself with ‘migrants’ who refuse to work, are rampant criminals and breed like rabbits.

Thanks to the Albanese government’s desperation to pander to the Muslim vote, Australia has been burdened with thousands more of the same.

Does anyone think this is going to be anything other than a disaster that will make Malcolm Fraser’s 1975 ‘Lebanese Concession’ look like a masterpiece of well-managed migration by comparison?