Table of Contents
Sooner or later, surely the legacy media will wear out their fingers, typing ‘far right’, over and over. Still, you can’t blame the poor dears: the wicked ‘far right’ (or, what most of us call ‘normal people’) are on the march. From Argentina to Australia, to the US and the UK, voters are rejecting the globalist-left’s ‘New World Order’. Not least because they’re sick to death of their countries being flooded with the violent, retrograde detritus of the Third World. Especially Muslims.
Denmark is the latest country to take a sharp right turn, almost entirely on the issue of mass immigration.
Denmark’s far-right Danish People’s Party said on Thursday it wants to scrap permanent residency and retroactively revoke it from many existing legal residents.
The far-right Danish People’s Party (DF) wants to “challenge the concept” of living permanently in Denmark as a foreign national, it said on Thursday as it announced new election policies.
The vehemently anti-immigration party said it should be impossible to achieve permanent residency rights in Denmark for any foreign national not closely related to a Danish citizen.
The legacy media hack has almost outdone himself, cramming not just two “far-rights”, but hammering the “vehemently anti-immigration” angle for all he’s worth. Meanwhile, more and more Danes just want the mendicants they foolishly opened their country to, to just skrub af.
Syrian nationals who came to Denmark during a migration wave in the mid-2010s while a civil war raged in their country are among those who should be targeted by the proposal, DF’s election candidate, current MEP Anders Vistisen said at a press briefing.
“This would mean the large group of Syrians in this country will be sent home,” Vistisen said, according to news wire Ritzau.
And why not? They’ve been mooching off the generous Danish welfare state for 15 years: at just four per cent of the population, Muslims scarf up nearly half of the country’s welfare payments.
And in return, they mete out an epidemic of rape. Along with Sweden, Denmark has become the rape capital of Europe. Rape crimes have soared in the last decade or so, just happening to correspond with the flood of Muslim ‘refugees’.
In any case, the war is over in Syria. Time for ‘asylum seekers’ to go home.
DF wants its proposed law to be enacted retroactively so that permanent residency can be revoked from persons who already have it. It is unclear whether this is possible under Danish law.
Then change the law. It’s that simple.
And if these ‘refugees’ can’t behave themselves… home they go.
However, the party wants all foreign nationals who live in Denmark to be given renewable residence permits, which are contingent on the holder retaining a clean criminal record and being able to provide for themselves through employment […]
“If you can’t find a job, you do not have a legal right of residence. And then the police would be able to start legal proceedings if you don’t leave the country voluntarily,” party leader Morten Messerschmidt said […]
In the same proposal, DF confirmed a policy first announced last week in which it said it will make its support for any future government contingent on the demand that a net emigration of Muslims from Denmark is enforced.
A great many Danes clearly agree. At the recent parliamentary elections, the DF stormed to 9.1 per cent of the national vote. While that’s well short of a vote to secure government, it’s been enough to bring down the incumbent. (Now former) Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen’s Social Democrats recorded their worse result in more than a century, drawing just 22 per cent of the vote. While the party initially claimed victory, days later, Frederiksen and her party submitted their resignation to the king.
The Social Democrats won just 38 seats in the Danish parliament. Their left-wing coalition secured a total of just 84 seats, well short of the necessary 90 to claim government. Right-leaning parties won 77 seats. The DF won 16 seats, a stunning rise from just five that they held prior to the election.
Notably, Frederiksen lost government despite adopting previously a tougher line on immigration. The changes included refusing persons with previous criminal convictions involving prison sentences of more than six months, or who have not been in full time employment for at least three-and-a-half of the last four years.
Many Danes clearly want to go harder. Much harder.
