Eminent Mathematician Backs Election Fraud Claims

President Trump continues to fight an uphill battle against a seemingly overwhelming alliance of Swamp Monsters: the Washington Establishment on both sides of politics (where, indeed, the Establishment RINOs are often deadlier foes than even the most unhinged Democrat), the Deep State and a mainstream media made even more vicious than ever as it thrashes in its death throes.

But that evidence that they keep telling us isn’t there just keeps piling up.

In a sworn declaration, a respected mathematician says his analysis of election data and phone interviews with Pennsylvania voters raises questions about as many as 100,000 absentee ballots requested in the key battleground state where President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by just about 82,000 votes.

This isn’t just some bloke down the pub with his “I just reckon”. He’s a respected Fellow of the American Mathematical Society with an impressive publication record, including, perhaps significantly, editing Theory and Applications of Benford’s Law.

Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data collected by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard as well as 2,684 voter interviews conducted by a phone bank and found two concerning patterns. One involved possible votes that were not counted, the other ballots that appeared to be requested by someone other than a registered voter.

“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn statement provided to Just the News.

According to Pennsylvania state data for early and absentee ballot requests, there are roughly 165,000 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that had not been counted as of Nov. 16.
Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor told Just the News that Miller’s analysis provides fresh evidence of potential voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

“This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election,” Trainor said.

“Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters.”

Pfft. Who are you going to believe? The mainstream media, or the chairman of the FEC?

Matt Braynard, the director of the Voter Integrity Project, which conducted the survey, said Miller’s conclusions are “indicative of a kind of problem that we’re seeing not just in Pennsylvania but in many of the other states that are determining the outcome of this election.”
“We’re sharing our data for the other states so that Professor Miller can conduct a similar analysis on them,” he told Just the News on Thursday. “I look forward to seeing the results.”

justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mathematics-prof-says-sworn-statement-many-56000-gop-ballots-pa-may-be

Don’t expect to see the results on CNN or even Fox News, though.

If you enjoyed this article please consider sharing it with your friends.