New Zealand First is invoking the rarely used “agree to disagree” clause in its coalition agreement over two new pathways to residency the government is today announcing for skilled migrants.
The clause has been triggered only a handful of times, with this the first time this term over immigration policy, which is expected to be a significant focus for NZ First at the 2026 election.
Leader Winston Peters said the government’s two new pathways to residency represented “unfocused immigration proposal”, with his party having concerns it may be used as a stepping stone to Australia.
“We take them in, train them, up-skill them, look after their families, and then they emigrate. How is this an effective immigration policy?” Peters asked.
NZ Herald
Face of the Day
Leader Winston Peters said the government’s two new pathways to residency represented “unfocused immigration proposal”, with his party having concerns it may be used as a stepping stone to Australia.
Related
Man of the Day
Gus was reported missing from his family’s property, Oak Park Station, on 27 September last year.
Face of the Day
“If you think about the people who’ve become very wealthy in New Zealand, they’ve all started from nothing.”
Face of the Day
Chris Bishop said he understands it would be a “hard ask” for Kiwis to take on an increase of 12 cents per litre, but he will not rule it out.
Latest
What Happens if the Host Population Changes?
Less Anglo-Polynesian, more Asian. Does it matter?
The Move-on Orders Need To Be Re-Evaluated
The government is effectively placing itself in the position of deciding what forms of expression are acceptable and what forms are not, measured against its own political and economic objectives.
Only Those Living off the Public Purse Could Be So Tone Deaf
As the old saying goes, turkeys don’t vote for an early Christmas.