Table of Contents
Summarised by Centrist
Hobson’s Pledge says Auckland Council is allowing iwi to use heritage laws to claim parts of privately owned land as “culturally significant,” sparking fresh debate over property rights.
In a post online, spokesperson Elliot Ikilei said the group has received complaints from residents who discovered that portions of their freehold property were being flagged by iwi for cultural or historic value, often without explanation.
One North Shore landowner reportedly asked the council to disclose correspondence between officials and Te Kawerau ā Maki, the iwi behind the claim. The council refused, saying it needed to “maintain its relationship with the iwi” and that it was “in the public interest” for iwi to continue supplying heritage information confidentially.
Hobson’s Pledge argues that such secrecy undermines transparency and sets a worrying precedent. “Most of us assume Treaty settlements deal with Crown land,” Ikilei wrote. “Not your backyard, not your family farm. But that assumption is starting to crack.”
The issue raises wider questions about how far heritage and cultural designations can reach, and whether councils are balancing Māori partnership obligations with the property rights of private citizens.
