When it comes to ‘transgenderism’, there are some distinct ‘types’. Some worse than others.
If it’s a very young ‘transwoman’ male, there’s almost certainly a ‘progressive’ mother behind it. A teenage ‘transman’ female is almost certainly a confused lesbian. If it’s an adult, especially middle-aged, sudden-onset ‘transwoman’ male, it’s almost certainly a predatory fetishist.
There are exceptions to these, as with any rule. But in the latter case, less so. Especially when the newly ‘transwoman’ male is a convicted sexual criminal.
In those revolting cases, the sudden-onset ‘transition’ is invariably motivated by two concerns: the hope (generally, sadly, well-founded) that judges will go easy on them and the too-obvious desire for access to a ready supply of captive fresh victims.
Case in point:
A father who raped his own three-year-old daughter has demanded to be placed in a women’s prison in Tasmania, prompting the state government to declare it has banned trans-identifying male prisoners from women’s prisons.
This is a rare outbreak of sanity here in Tasmanian officialdom, where it was only recently discovered that the state’s library service had banned feminist group Women Speak Tasmania from using its facilities (while at the same time stocking children’s shelves with sleazy trans-grooming material). The state’s ‘human rights’ apparatus has also been weaponised in favour of the predatory male fetishists.
Let’s see if the trans-activist network rallies around this monster.
The pedophile, described by Tasmanian prison sources as “the worst of the worst”, set up a camera to record himself engaging in sex acts with the girl while he was dressed in women’s clothing.
Fortunately, Deputy Premier, Attorney-General and Corrections Minister Guy Barnett is made of sterner stuff than most political jellyfish. Barnett has ordered the state’s corrections service to give “absolute priority” to the safety of female prisoners, which means putting predatory men where they belong, no matter how much they frock it up.
“The presence of any male prisoner in a women’s prison would present unacceptable safety risks to female prisoners,” Mr Barnett told the Australian […]
The Tasmanian government’s tough stand was revealed in a letter from Mr Barnett to Women’s Forum Australia chief executive Rachael Wong, who had written to him seeking clarification of the state’s prisons policy.
Mr Barnett told Ms Wong he was not aware of any biological men currently in Tasmanian women’s prisons and that a recent request had been rejected.
“As minister, I expect the Department of Justice and Tasmanian Prison Service to absolutely prioritise safety of female prisoners, and I have made this expectation clear to the department and the TPS,” Mr Barnett said in the letter.
“I have recently been briefed on a request from a serious child sex offender to be placed in a women’s correction facility. That request has not been, and will not be, accommodated.”
Meanwhile, in the two states competing for the title of Australia’s Wokest – Victoria and South Australia – ‘trans’ predators are being handed a golden ticket to fresh prey.
A father who sexually abused his five-year-old daughter is being held in a Victorian female correctional centre because he now identifies as a woman, and that several women in prison in South Australian have been attacked – and in at least one case sexually assaulted – by notorious trans inmate Krista Richards […]
In one case revealed by the Australian, 29-year-old “Katie” said she was digitally penetrated in brutal sexual assault by the dominating 69-year-old Richards, while 30-year-old “Emma” revealed her “five months of hell” locked in a prison cell with the would-be hitman who “owns the jail”, seeks out “young, pretty, blonde” female inmates and boasts of having killed 14 people.
Several other inmates claim to have been assaulted by Richards, including one woman, “Jeni”, who told the Australian she was attacked in Adelaide Women’s prison in 2022 after an argument.
In the case of the Tasmanian monster, the only place he should be going is straight into the woodchipper.
Mr Barnett did not identify the sex offender but the Australian understands he is an inmate identified in court records only as MGM, to protect the identity of the child. MGM had set up a camera and recorded himself engaging in sexual acts with the three-year-old while dressed in women’s clothing. The court was told the child still suffered nightmares, exhibited “challenging behaviour” and was developmentally delayed.
Yet, even a disgusting predator like that can always rely on a soft-touch legal establishment.
MGM was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years, and was sent to a minimum-security men’s prison, after being convicted on charges of indecent assault and producing child exploitation material. He became eligible for parole in February 2023.
A psychologist’s report prepared for the parole board noted that MGM’s offending “occurred during a time when he was significantly abusing drugs and this use had been contributed to by the applicant’s longstanding sexual and gender identity confusion”.
The parole board took into account that MGM had “taken steps to engage with appropriate supports in relation to his sexuality and gender identity” and granted him parole.
We all know how that was going to end.
Yep, he quickly breached his parole conditions and was thrown back in prison. Where he immediately applied to be transferred to a women’s prison.
Just chuck him in the men’s exercise yard and send the guards off on tea break for 10 minutes.
