Table of Contents
As the Trump administration continues its battle to implement the will of the American people over the determined opposition of an unelected and unaccountable judiciary, it’s winning some, but marking time on others. From the moment Donald Trump was re-elected as president, with a clear mandate to reverse years of uncontrolled illegal immigration, a slew of minor judges, largely appointed by Trump’s political enemies, have fought tooth and nail to thwart what the American people overwhelmingly voted for and, according to all polls, still overwhelmingly support.
First, the victory.
A federal appeals court handed the Trump administration a key victory on Monday by allowing its third-country deportation policy to continue while a lawsuit challenging it continues to be litigated.
A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit ruled 2-1 in favor of halting the lower court’s ruling, which found the administration’s policy of deporting illegal immigrants to countries other than their country of origin was unlawful. The ruling builds on a temporary halt to the lower court’s order issued last week, allowing the policy to remain in place until the case is argued before the three-judge panel.
Meanwhile, the petty judiciary continues to act as if it’s an unelected law unto itself.
US District Judge Brian Murphy, a Biden appointee, had blocked Trump’s third-country deportation policy last month, ruling it was “not fine, nor is it legal,” even after the Supreme Court had twice allowed the policy to continue in the interim via their emergency docket.
The Supreme Court previously lifted Murphy’s preliminary injunction.
But, if there’s one thing we know about the left, it’s that they never take ‘no’ for an answer. They simply hold their little bweafs, stamp their little feets and try to wear down the democratic process with endless lawfare.
The ruling in the 1st Circuit on Monday marks a rare victory in an appeals court made up of mostly Democrat-appointed judges.
During the first year of Trump’s second term in the White House, the circuit had denied efforts to lift high-profile blocks of various Trump policies. When the administration appealed those 1st Circuit rulings to the Supreme Court, the majority on the high court ruled in the Trump administration’s favor each time in 2025.
This suggests that a wholesale clean out of the lower courts is in order. If these judges are so regularly making what the Supreme Court rules are unlawful judgements, then why are they still sitting on any bench? A pilot who regularly crashed airliners would soon be out of work, if not in jail.
Meanwhile, the lawfare continues unabated. On two other cases, the Trump administration is still being stymied by judicial midgets with Vote Blue buttons and with the active connivance of the legacy media.
The US Supreme Court will hear arguments about President Donald Trump’s administration’s initiative to end the protection of people fleeing war and natural disasters in countries around the world, including Haiti and Syria.
Except that there haven’t been wars or natural disasters in those countries, for years in some cases. So, why are they still in America? War’s over – piss off back home.
On Monday, the Supreme Court made the decision to hear the arguments after the case came from the lower instances, as numerous judges have delayed the end of protections that allowed people with temporary protective status to live and work in the United States […]
The Trump Administration maintains that the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program and other humanitarian protections have been “misused,” so they are trying to get citizens of warring countries or people affected by natural disasters to lose this special coverage.
To reiterate: the countries concerned are no longer at war and the natural disasters were years ago.
The minor judicial activists are also trying frantically to keep racism alive in American institutions.
A judge ruled on Friday to temporarily stall efforts by the Trump administrations demanding race-based admissions data from universities.
US District Judge F Dennis Saylor ruled in favor of the 17 blue states that challenged the administration’s new reporting requirements, arguing they were costly and burdensome to universities.
So was ending slavery and Jim Crow. But America spent vast amounts of blood and treasure to end both, because they were racist. So are race-based admissions. When Asian and Jewish students with impeccable academic records and character are shunted aside in favour of Black dullards who can shoot hoops, that’s as racist as separate water fountains.
But that, clearly, is just how the left like it.
