There are few things more infuriating than internet leftists… well, full stop. But what is particularly infuriating is when internet leftists plunder the Christian scripture they spend 99 per cent of the time mocking and try to use it as a knock-down argument against centre-right politics.
It’s not just the hypocrisy that’s so infuriating – it’s the staggering ignorance.
Jesus was a Palestinian refugee! No, he wasn’t. Not in any sense. Nor was he a ‘socialist’.
And he absolutely would not have been an open borders dementoid.
Many people repeatedly use the verse: “When a stranger resides with you, you shall love them as yourself” (Leviticus 19:33-34) to speak in favor of mass illegal immigration and justify it.
They forget, or more likely never knew, what the Gospels have to say.
“Anyone who does not enter the sheepfold by the gate, but climbs in by another way, that person is a thief and a robber” (John 10:1).
The same Christ who commanded love of neighbour also warned against those who sneak in to steal, kill and destroy. The modern open-borders cult never quotes that bit. Funny, that.
Saint Thomas Aquinas set forth one of the most brilliant arguments ever written on immigration, which effectively shaped the West for nearly 1,000 years.
Aquinas was no woolly headed sentimentalist. He laid down hard rules. Immigration must be proportionate. Foreigners must properly assimilate into the culture and religion of their host. Citizenship and its rights should only be granted after the third generation. The common good of existing citizens must always come first.
And some peoples are simply ‘perpetual enemies’ of one another. Let’s see you quote that one with a holier-than-thou smirk, leftists.
“Incompatible” is a word that perfectly describes an evident problem: in many countries, the historically Catholic population is being deliberately replaced – and with the help of governments – by cults that eagerly seek the disappearance of Catholicism.
This is not theory. It is observable fact from Sweden to France to the suburbs of Melbourne. When governments import incompatible cultures by the hundreds of thousands while sneering at their own heritage, the result is not enrichment: it is replacement.
When millions of single men of military age arrive illegally by boat to consume the state’s resources and with the intention of erasing the Christian identity of the nation that receives them, this is not a humanitarian problem but a planned invasion.
The same people who spent years screaming that border security was racist now pretend that importing entire parallel societies hostile to the host culture is simple compassion. They demand we feed and house the very people whose ideology explicitly calls for our subjugation or elimination.
Opposing an immigration that seeks to erase or replace a people’s Catholic identity is not an act of lack of charity, but a MORAL DUTY in defense of your own church.
Aquinas understood what the modern left pretends not to: a nation that cannot control its borders has already surrendered its sovereignty. A people that refuses to put its own survival first has lost the will to live.
The verse about loving the stranger was never a suicide pact. It was never an invitation to national self-erasure. And it certainly was never a commandment to import your own executioners.
The left can keep mangling scripture to suit their open-borders fetish. The rest of us will stick with the actual teaching: secure the gate, preserve the culture and never apologise for putting your own people first.
