Skip to content
letter to the editor letters

Table of Contents

Dear Editor

Who would you prefer as your doctor? An unvaxxed doctor or a drunken wife beater?

Assault your wife and threaten to kill her in a prolonged attack, hands around her neck, threaten to shoot police, have three previous drink driving convictions – but never mind, you can still practise as a doctor.

However, if you fail to give your informed consent and submit to an experimental jab, they remove your licence to practise medicine.  That’s the Medical Council of New Zealand.

According to the journal New Zealand Doctor, at least 56 DHB doctors, 24 of them senior medical officers, have been stood down for failing to take the jab.

I don’t know how many other doctors have been fired for this ‘heinous crime’.

However, the NZ Herald reports that a doctor with a criminal history poured alcohol over his wife, ripped open her shirt to prod her torso with a fork while calling her fat and threatened to shoot police. He has three previous convictions for driving with excess blood alcohol. After a Professional Conduct Committee hearing, he has been censured and will be monitored by a Health Committee but is still able to practise as a doctor.

Could someone please explain the rationale for treating criminal behaviour so lightly, while punishing so severely, exemplary doctors who simply followed their informed conscience regarding the Covid-19 jab?

Qavah

Latest

The Labour Government’s Vote Machine

The Labour Government’s Vote Machine

At its core, this is not about Muslims at all. It is about how a governing party chooses to organise society. Does it treat citizens as individuals under a shared civic contract, or as demographic blocs to be structured, managed and electorally harvested?

Members Public