Table of Contents
Matua Kahurangi
Just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes.
If you’re on X, you may have seen a report by independent journalist Nick Shirley into Somali-run daycare centres in Minneapolis. According to the investigation, these centres received staggering sums of public money despite reportedly having no enrolled children. The 42-minute video has racked up around 84 million views on X since it was posted on 26 December. That does not happen by accident. It happens because people recognise a scandal when they see one.
Elon Musk responded with a blunt assessment. He argued that fraudulent government programmes have been used for years to import and retain immigrant voting blocs, hollowing out democracy and turning countries into de facto one-party states. He pointed to Minnesota, once home to virtually no Somalis, now electing Ilhan Omar, and warned that the same dynamics are playing out across Europe, the UK, Canada, Australia and, crucially, New Zealand.
The radical left has been using fraudulent government programs for a long time to import and retain vast numbers of illegal (and legal, in some cases) immigrants to win elections and turn America into a single-party state, destroying any real democracy.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 27, 2025
The more you look at it,…
That last country should make us uncomfortable, because it hits close to home.
In New Zealand, we have developed our own version of this problem. Not with daycare centres in Minneapolis, but with a cottage industry of taxpayer-funded ‘charities’ and ‘trusts’ that seem permanently flush with cash and chronically short on measurable outcomes. When organisations like Waipareira Trust can collect hundreds of millions of dollars in public funding while delivering results that are, at best, opaque, Musk’s warning starts to look less like hyperbole and more like a red flag.
When John Tamihere’s Waipareira Trust was a charity, it pulled in hundreds of millions. Yet the people it was meant to help are still homeless, eating out of bins, and hooked on meth. Introducing POV: A day in the life of John Tamihere. #nzpol pic.twitter.com/FH7MpElmpL
— Matua Kahurangi (@MatuaKahurangi) December 29, 2025
This is not an attack on Māori, Pasifika or anyone else as a people. It is a critique of a system that rewards the right branding, the right buzzwords and the right political alignment, while punishing scrutiny. In practice, if you register a charity, promise transformational outcomes, document a few photogenic community initiatives and tick the right cultural boxes, the funding spigot opens. What begins as a genuine effort can quickly morph into something else once the money becomes effectively unlimited.
Take the numbers. According to Waipareira Trust’s own annual reporting, 13.3 full-time equivalent senior managers earned an average of around $510,000 a year. Half a million dollars each. For an organisation whose stated mission is to uplift Māori communities, that figure is not just eye-watering – it is obscene. If you are serious about reducing inequality, you do not do it by creating a new elite paid for by the very taxpayers you claim to be helping.
Waipareira is not alone. Too many organisations follow the same blueprint. Minimal frontline impact, maximum administrative bloat. Brand new Ford Rangers. Overseas ‘staff conferences’ that look suspiciously like paid holidays. Executive salaries that would make a private sector CEO blush. All funded by public money, all justified in the name of helping the vulnerable.
My taxes and yours already support people in genuine hardship through the welfare system. That support is administered by Ministry of Social Development, an agency that at least operates under clear rules, public accountability and parliamentary oversight. If the government has hundreds of millions to throw around, maybe it should stop laundering that money through quasi-charitable entities that set their own pay packets and start putting it where transparency actually exists.
New Zealand needs to put these charities under a microscope. Not a friendly review, not another glossy report, but hard audits, clear benchmarks and real consequences. Because right now, too many people are laughing all the way to the bank, and the people they claim to represent are no better off.
If that does not worry you, it should.
Correction: In the earlier post, I stated that John Tamihere’s trust had its charity status cancelled. It was pointed out to me by Katrina Biggs that this was incorrect. In accordance with section 55D of the Charities Act 2005, the board ruled not to deregister CC31649, Te Whānau o Waipareira Trust, from the Charities Register. Thanks for correcting me, Katrina. I’ve added a complimentary extra three-months subscription.
Katrina’s blog is well worth a read. You can check it out here: https://aboldwoman.substack.com/
This article was originally published on the author’s Substack.