New Zealand’s intelligence services last year warned there was a “realistic possibility” someone inspired by anti-government rhetoric could commit a “spontaneous act of extremist violence”.
It’s thought that act of violence could happen “during a routine act of legal or regulatory enforcement”.
Wait one cotton-picking minute let’s look again at what they are actually saying…
[…] CTAG and NZP are currently not aware of any information to indicate a credible, specific threat of extremist violence from SovCit individuals or groups in New Zealand or against New Zealand interests abroad.”
So why exactly do they have their tits in a tangle?
But there was a “realistic possibility that a violent extremist or group of violent extremists, motivated by SovCit beliefs, will commit a spontaneous act of violence in direct response to a perceived ‘assault’ by government agencies during a routine act of legal or regulatory enforcement”.
Let’s just back the truck up here, shall we?
” a spontaneous act of violence in direct response to a perceived ‘assault’ by government agencies during a routine act of legal or regulatory enforcement”.
Do they mean like peaceful protesters refusing to leave after the police destroyed all their possessions…pepper sprayed them, sprayed them with a fire extinguisher, chucked bricks at them, used sonic weapons on them and fired rubber bullets at them? …that kind of perceived ‘assault’ by government agencies?
Read more here. Discuss it on The BFD.
