John Rofe
Every year my wife and I each have a flu shot. Occasionally it doesn’t give the duration or amount of protection I need, but statistically, I am convinced it works.
The World Economic Forum (y’know, the globalist billionaires who established the UN IPCC) now says we should have lockdowns every two years to save the planet from “climate change”.
The problem is three-fold. First, the decisions that were taken in the first instance were justified by a massive overstatement of the Covid-19 risk for New Zealand. Hospitals were actually closed to patients from the outset to prepare for a flood of cases that never arrived and many staff were stood down while wards were emptied. I was in North Shore Ward 4 at the time and witnessed the evacuation and shut-down.
Second, there is concern that such preventative measures as mask-wearing and lockdowns have had very little proven effect. Sure quarantine worked. But the lockdowns only made it easier for the MoH to mop up and eliminate pockets of infection; and for that we doubled national debt and made many people insolvent. The rights of citizens to earn a living were totally ignored. The attack on cheap and effective drugs (not just hydroxychloroquine but also many medicines I am familiar with) left many people questioning as to why they were outlawed.
The third issue is that there was a “strategic decision” (reputedly taken by the same unelected WHO functionaries whose actions and advice initially led to the spread of the disease globally) to change the practice of gathering mortality statistics for only those who died from the disease to include those who also died with the disease. They thereby grossly overstated the instances of Covid-19 deaths compared with flu deaths in previous seasons.
The average age of those who died was well over 65 years (in some countries reportedly over 75 years) while the statistics for deaths from all other typical causes of death dropped substantially. So, now, many New Zealanders who have been subjected to this disinformation totally distrust whatever they are told.
If these allegations are wrong, the Government must refute them and not just rely on people being “KIND” enough to not raise them.
Ardern tells us that she made a “captain’s call” to institute a level 4 lockdown when only a level 2 was recommended. In doing so she must have known (or should have known) that this would make the average “bourgeoisie” small business reliant on the state for survival because they all live or die on their cash flow. Once handouts were given, she could wash her hands of having destroyed sections of the business community. Her aspirations as a “progressive socialist activist” to replace democracy with socialism would also be met, so it was an easy decision for her to make. It allowed her daily prime-time TV coverage on which to show off how “kind” she could be with taxpayers’ cash. The 2020 election was therefore bought and paid for and people are just now awakening.
Sooner or later someone will take action against the government for their over-reach, overreaction and abrogation of the rights of NZ citizens.
The health system trumpets the principle of informed consent until “Princess” Jacinda thinks that she doesn’t need to bother.
It isn’t OK to label people who are rightly suspicious of government-sponsored vaccinations as “anti-vax” nut jobs. The number of reasons why they could be right mounts up and will continue to do so, until there is transparency regarding vaccination side-effects.
When the kind of court case in this dubious item below comes to New Zealand, what will you say you did to hold the Government to account?
Please think this through very carefully.
Please share this BFD article so others can discover The BFD.
