The Beginning of Healing or a Theatre of the Absurd?
Brooke van Velden is planning to withhold the report from phase one of the RCI, possibly until 2026. Why?
Brooke van Velden is planning to withhold the report from phase one of the RCI, possibly until 2026. Why?
As there are simple ways to settle the important questions of excess deaths, the extent and cause of the problem, why are the statistics being withheld?
It is a sad state of affairs when doctors feel they cannot speak out for fear of massive fines and/or suspension, despite the medical council providing no proof of harm to patients or the public.
Which side was censored at the behest of the Federal Government by social media platforms during the pandemic? Which side would a ban on “gain-of-function” research hurt the most? The answers to these questions are obvious to anyone paying attention.
As time passes, and 2020–2022 fades in our memories, people do start to forget. Looking back on the madness of those years, it’s almost difficult to believe all of this actually happened.
The MSM splashed the Covid arrests, goes quiet on the acquittals.
How many New Zealanders would have taken a jab if they had been told the Truth? That it was 0.84 per cent effective, not 95 per cent effective?
Recently published research indicates that such a position is no longer in any way morally defensible. It is time to speak out freely and correct public misperceptions about mRNA vaccine safety and efficacy.
All 120 MPs’ mouths seem zipped tight about the Covid-19 vaccination.
Post-lockdowns, young people are suffering alarming declines in mental health.
Warnings that lockdowns would lead to an explosion of cancers were simply ignored by the Covid class.
Those who partook in and set up the framework for this abusive behaviour must face personal punishment or they will do it again.
They were not very good scientists before the pandemic and they are still not very good now
In agriculture, public health, and medicine, we should stop envisioning and hyping magic technological bullets that empower governments and enrich investors more than they benefit their purported target populations.
There are very deep principles of democracy and legitimacy at stake – the duty of care for its citizens that a government must evidence.