Why Is the Guardian Still Calling Charlie Kirk “Far Right”?
Why is the left not examining its own virulence, causticity and bigotry?
Why is the left not examining its own virulence, causticity and bigotry?
The assassination of Charlie Kirk is yet another sad illustration that too many prefer violence to rational debate.
Prohibition doesn’t work, nor does the quasi-prohibition approach of high taxes and endless red tape. The black market is now the market.
When too many ran from a dying woman, an unnamed hero stepped up.
Alphabet networks and legacy newspapers can’t seem to make themselves report anything that contradicts the narrative.
When does murder get ignored? When the victim is white and the killer black.
Surgeon gets legs amputated ‘for his own sexual gratification’.
Unprovoked and savage black-on-white murder is ignored by the media.
Rather than admit their mistakes and work to fix the mess they’ve created, Britain’s government is criminalizing the truth to cover up their lies and failures.
Why is it so hard for many politicians and media commentators to speak openly and honestly in the face of such tragedy?
Police and media still trying to keep secrets.
Gov Pritzker and Mayor Johnson need to follow the data, learn from DC, and embrace strategies that make it riskier for criminals to commit crimes.
I think both Savage and his editors were guilty of a gross failure of editorial judgment for running a story that presented him as someone worthy of our respect.