Free Speech and Jewish Safety on Campus Are Not Incompatible
It’s time universities take Columbia’s lead and act like it.
It’s time universities take Columbia’s lead and act like it.
It is far better that people are free to discriminate, with the market free to react, than to pass more ineffective laws which merely hide the practice rather than eliminate it.
Whether tribalism is along gender or ethnic lines, it discourages, if not extinguishes, freedom of thought and speech.
Those boycotting the Bendigo Writer’s Festival don’t give a damn about free speech.
Digital backdoors must be recognised as a threat to your privacy, security and, most importantly, freedom.
I will continue to comment but I have to be careful in what I report and the language that I use.
The astonishing bureaucratic secret inquisition into a Christian doctor.
They’re no longer universities in any meaningful intellectual or moral sense. They are anti-universities. They are cognitive enclosures: accredited zones of pre-approved ideas and ideologically screened emotions. These curated mind spaces are committed not to inquiry, but to orthodoxy.
Therefore, it is crucial that we remain alert to global digital regulation trends and actively defend freedom of expression, avoiding the adoption of European models, as freedom is lost gradually, slice by slice, through centralized decisions.
The liberty to be anonymous online is worth protecting, not because anonymity is an absolute good, but because the alternatives proposed by the state are far worse.
Which means it’s a very good week for free speech.
Now that leftists are facing the consequences of free speech, they can’t identify the inconsistency. I suspect that is more likely the result of political inconvenience than genuine confusion.