Some might blame Jane and her mum for being scroungers. As it happens I don’t: they seem to me to be making a perfectly logical, if short-term, financial decision. £72 a week is available so why not take it?
We have arrived at a time where nature itself is regarded as a pathogen, something to be replaced with man-made invasive and essentially destructive technologies.
After mounting evidence of vaccine-linked myocarditis.
While not nearly complete and very much a work in progress, the efforts and successes of the Kennedy-Trump alliance are real and significant.
Critics argue that these efforts, paired with vaccine development, risk engineering the very outbreaks that officials are now preparing to contain. They question whether authorities are laying the groundwork for a vaccine-driven public health emergency.
I don’t know what Kennedy thinks about AI, but I am truly grateful he did not appoint a short-sighted computer to replace the committee, instead trusting in common sense. I second that.
New Zealand doesn’t need more AI-run hospitals or a $10 billion digital health overhaul. We need real food, strong bodies, clear minds, and healthy kids raised in fresh air and sunlight.
Despite serious medical concerns Angela was denied an exemption from her second dose. She has now won an ACC claim recognising vaccine-induced injuries and “long Covid”.
Despite best intentions, the ‘by Māori for Māori’ Matauranga Māori approach is not shifting the dial.
“Dissent is the very essence of science” declare employees of NIH – but groupthink and replicability crises reign. Dr Bhattacharya knows first hand what happens when curiosity meets bureaucracy. Can he change that culture?
President Trump signed an executive order prohibiting federal funding for educational institutions that mandate Covid–19 vaccines for in-person attendance. Medical schools reliant on federal funds may want to reconsider.
In response to David Farrier’s blog, Paul Thistoll’s behaviour, and David Fisher’s upcoming article: It is appalling that the details of the most devastating aspects of our family life is being used by activists to paint us as bad parents.
The author argues that presenting euthanasia as a compassionate option is misleading when basic end-of-life care is so unevenly distributed.
We should not be sanitising the country for the small number of people who refuse to take responsibility for themselves.
