The NZ government wants to increase the permitted residual amounts of glyphosate by up to 100 times on crops that provide food eaten every day by New Zealanders. Based on the history of this product it will damage the health of our people and poison our food and our soil.
It’s nearly impossible to say New Zealand’s euthanasia regime is safe when the Ministry of Health can’t even add up the numbers correctly (again).
Abandons public engagement for the left’s echo chamber.
This deals clearly with the reality of vaccine injuries and how the medical system failed to inform the public in order to protect the vaccine push, the statistical evidence of the wide scale of harms, and the attempts to silence the media, the vaccine injured and doctors who were whistleblowers.
She can no longer escape condemnation for her husband’s downfall.
With New Zealand’s books in dire straits, every dollar counts. The government should conduct a full audit of the HRC’s spending and identify projects that fail to deliver real health benefits.
If we were to stop using plastic tomorrow, global supply chains would collapse, food wouldn’t reach the people who need it in remote areas, and millions would lose access to life-saving medical supplies.
The NHS has mistreated Christian nurse Jennifer Melle who stood up to their trans dogma.
But racist when anyone else does the same?
There are laws that are doing real harm and I would like to see that acknowledged in the public debate.
Contrary to the conspiracy theories, it can’t even get under your skin.
This is classic Edwards: cherry-picking facts to fit a narrative while ignoring the messy reality of policy-making and the equally potent influence of his preferred lobbyists.
RNZ’s hit piece is less about uncovering truth and more about pushing a narrative. They’re happy to amplify state-funded lobbyists like HCA while vilifying industry players, all under the guise of public interest.
