Skip to content

Politics

Everything about politics

Laughing at Climate Hysteria

Laughing at Climate Hysteria

David Wojick cfact.org David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. We should laugh at climate hysteria, especially the fantasy proposals for stopping evil climate change. Electrify everything, running it on wind and solar? Restructure the economy? Restart the world

Members Public
NZ COVID Disaster Movie Lacking a Plan

NZ COVID Disaster Movie Lacking a Plan

Francis Kennedy I want you to forget about Covid, passports and traffic lights for a moment and I want to throw one word out there – “process”. Picture any disaster movie you want and you can visualise a round table of experts drawn from various countries or fields to discuss how

Members Public
A Walk down Memory Lane
NZ

A Walk down Memory Lane

Harry Hunt In a desperate attempt to not acknowledge their failures, Labour has done the smart thing. They have listened to the National Party. By doing this, they are acknowledging the ghost of Kiwibuild over 4 years after it failed and how it will haunt their tarnished legacy for a

Members Public
Dealing with the Backsliders

Dealing with the Backsliders

Michael Bassett bassettbrashandhide.com Political historian Michael Bassett CNZM is the author of 15 books, was a regular columnist for the Fairfax newspapers and a former Minister in the 1984-1990 governments I grew up in a New Zealand where we looked up to really inspiring people. People who made

Members Public
Letter to the Editor: Ardern’s Divisive Legacy

Letter to the Editor: Ardern’s Divisive Legacy

Dear Editor The legacy of Ardern is shaping up to be the most divisive in NZ history, even surpassing Muldoon’s tenure as PM and that is somewhat unkind to him as he achieved many good things and his modus operandi was clearly understood. The current government has been surreptitiously

Members Public
Misleading Use of Statistics to Pfizer’s Advantage

Misleading Use of Statistics to Pfizer’s Advantage

I am a nerd and I do statistics as a hobby! For the record, I am double-jabbed based on an assessment of my personal risk but I am absolutely pro-choice because the risk for many other people is more from the vaccine than the virus. The abuse of

Members Public
Holding Us to Ransom? Really?

Holding Us to Ransom? Really?

Lewis Andrew sojournal.co.nz In the past few weeks, I have begun to hear the phrase ‘holding us to ransom’ a lot more frequently. Specifically, it is the unvaccinated who are apparently holding the country to ransom. Is this really accurate? Let’s imagine a scenario where a terrorist

Members Public
woman putting her hand on her lips

An End of Showboating Action Called For

Sir Bob Jones nopunchespulled.com The giant Merck pharmaceutical company has announced production of its covid “booster pill” which it has successfully tested. It’s abundantly clear that boosters are critical, our Pfizer vaccines losing strength within six months. While no doubt Covid Minister Hipkins will trot out our “head

Members Public
The Team of 90%

The Team of 90%

Joanna Pennyfeather So it is finally official. New Zealand is a two-class system, with some people granted some of their basic human rights and freedoms back, and others being actively and legally discriminated against. The unpersoning of the unvaccinated is now government policy. Medical apartheid is now a fact.

Members Public
COVID Pass in Lithuania and throughout Europe: Part 7

COVID Pass in Lithuania and throughout Europe: Part 7

@gluboco How to help: please amplify this message My initial goal with this article was to inform English-language readers of the Covid Pass changes happening in Europe. But as I’ve seen that my post has bounced back and gotten attention in my country, I’ve thought that maybe

Members Public
NZ Herald Hit Job of the Day

NZ Herald Hit Job of the Day

The NZ Herald in the past attacked a popular NZ blog site for publishing articles that they described as “hit jobs”. They claimed that the articles were unethical because the author of the articles had allegedly been paid to write them. How then should we view this article by the

Members Public