One of the last questions Charlie Kirk fielded before his shocking murder was about ‘transgender’ mass shooters, right before he was murdered by a demented leftoid who was banging a tranny. You can’t make this stuff up.
The college-deranged assassin killed Charlie right after he said that “too many” transgenders had been mass shooters. He was right. Of course, even one mass shooter is too many, but Kirk’s point was that the number of cross-dressing mass shooters is in grotesque disproportion to their slice of the population. The gender-deluded are nearly 10 times more likely to be a shooter than the general population.
Naturally, then legacy media lie through their teeth about it.
On Sunday, the New York Times published an idiotic op-ed to that effect by Nathan Taylor Pemberton, who […] Long after it had been established that Kirk’s shooter, Tyler Robinson, was in a romantic relationship with a transgender, Pemberton proclaimed: “The only thing that can be said conclusively about Mr Robinson, at this moment, is that he was a chronically online, white American male.”
Really? Was that the only thing that stuck out about the accused shooter?
On that logic, then, we can narrow down mass-shooting suspects to the 93 per cent of Americans who use the internet. Or at least the 30 per cent who admit to using it ‘constantly’. Phew, glad we eliminated 220,000 suspects. Only 96 million to go.
Or maybe – just hear me out – ‘radical socialist who was banging a tranny’ is kind of a biggie when it comes to profiling a perp?
The only thing that would have stood out like a ‘girldick’ would be if he was a tranny himself, which, given the apparent speed and depth of his radicalisation after just one semester of university, was surely just a course of oestrogen and a wardrobe change away.
Because, as already mentioned, troons are nearly 10 times more like to be mass-shooters than anyone else – leaving aside their grotesquely outsized likelihood of committing other violent crimes. It’s almost like mental illness carries a 400 per cent increased risk of violent behaviour.
Transgenders are, at most, one per cent of the population. That’s about the same as the percentage of Americans who are deaf, missing a limb, have eyes of two different colors or support Stacey Abrams for any elected office.
The preponderance of deaf or amputee mass shooters does not seem to be in evidence. In just the past decade, though, the men-in-dresses brigade are mass-shooting well above their weight.
Just as they do with Muslim mass-shooters (also far more statistically likely than other groups), the legacy media fall back on three tried’n’true responses:
• Bury the story
• Lie about it
• Attack anyone who notices as a ‘right-wing conspiracy theorist’.
In the second instance, the legacy media don’t just lie, but happily break some of their most precious, recently made up rules: ‘misgendering’ and ‘deadnaming’. Rather than refer, as they sternly insist we plebs must, to a male as ‘she’, they for once in their loathesome careers correctly identify a man in a dress as a man.
If all else fails, bring out the big guns of legacy media lying: the ‘fact checkers’.
One transgender shooting that got gobs of media attention was the attack on the Houston megachurch.
AP’s “fact check” was typical:
“CLAIM: The shooter who carried out an attack injuring two people at a Texas megachurch on Sunday has been identified as transgender.
“AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Houston police said on Monday that its investigation has thus far determined that the shooter, Genesse Ivonne Moreno, identified as female …”
The latest gambit is to blame social media.
This is yet another case of a legacy media lying to protect their turf from an upstart new technology that threatens their cashflow. Case in point: the ‘War of the Worlds radio broadcast panic’. Guess what? It’s a fabrication. There were no mobs of terrified rednecks out hunting Martians the night Orson Welles broadcast his famous radio play. There were a few phone calls to the station, mostly from people wondering why the music programme they were enjoying kept being interrupted by so-called ‘news flashes’.
The ‘panic’ was a hoax fabricated by newspapers, who wanted to take this newfangled radio media down a peg or two and stop it from stealing their readers (thereby threatening their profits).
Without the internet, we’d be trapped in a media bubble, forced to rely on geniuses like Pemberton who informed Times readers that Robinson “most likely committed” Kirk’s murder as “an ironic gesture”; that Kirk “used his platform to coarsen our political discourse”; and that he was “a showman who attracted disaffected young Americans into the conservative movement with fantasies of white replacement or racial grievance.”
No wonder they’re so desperate to control our internet access. We might stop believing misinformation like that.
