Table of Contents
Today’s case-in-point for my long-running campaign to hold judges accountable for their often jaw-droppingly dumb, if not dangerous, decisions comes from Germany. It concerns, I’m sure you’ll all be astonished to learn, a white, female, middle-aged judge and a marauding pack of ‘migrant’ gang-rapists and their white teenage victim.
I’m sure you’ll be even more astonished that the judge let nearly all of the foreign predators walk scot-free.
Eight out of nine young men convicted of gang-raping a heavily intoxicated 15-year-old girl in a Hamburg city park will not face prison time, in a verdict that has sparked widespread outrage in Germany and threats against the judge and lawyers involved in the case.
Hamburg Regional Court last week sentenced a 19-year-old to a youth prison sentence of two years and nine months without parole, while youth sentences of one to two years’ probation, or so-called pre-parole, were imposed on eight men, Spiegel reported.
A tenth defendant was acquitted.
Oh, but they had a perfectly good excuse, according to yet another middle-aged, tilty-head white woman. ‘Migration frustration.’ Yes, you read that right.
Psychiatrist Nahlah Saimeh, who reportedly appeared before the court as an expert witness, said in a controversial interview with Spiegel that the gang rape may have been a way to vent “frustration” due to “migration experiences and sociocultural homelessness”.
Dr Saimeh said perpetrators “who live on the margins of society, completely uprooted culturally, linguistically and socially” could face a “mix of emotions of anger, sadness, powerlessness, depression, fantasies of grandeur as a compensation attempt to cope with one’s own misery, and drug use”.
“Disordered, unprepared migration experiences and sociocultural homelessness increase the risk of addiction and psychosis,” she said.
“Sex is also a means of venting frustration and anger, a means of warding off sadness and emptiness, and in a group of men with the same fate it also creates identity and strengthens the group feeling.”
She added, “The victim becomes a pure instrument for their own sexual gratification. It’s about an immediate need, opportunity, inner conviction and the right of the stronger.”
And, how, exactly, does that become an exonerating factor? To you or me, I’m pretty sure that sounds like just more reason to treat them like the pack animals that they are.
But we’re dealing with modern judges here – who’ll turn migrant pack-rapists free, but jail anyone who says so much as a mean word about them.
A woman has been given a prison sentence in Germany for making ‘harmful comments’ towards a gang-rapist after learning of his heinous crime.
The man was one of nine attackers who were found guilty of brutally raping a 15-year-old girl in a city park in Hamburg – with all but one of the convicted men and teenagers allowed to walk free […]
‘Without thinking twice,’ the woman decided to vent her anger at him because she felt he deserved it, labelling him a ‘dishonorable rapist pig’ and a ‘disgusting freak’.
Where was she wrong?
As for the legal fraternity, they’re outraged… that anyone would dare criticise such a monumentally grotesque decision.
The Hamburg Judges Association said it was dismayed by the “unbearable agitation against a colleague who had fulfilled the task assigned to her under the (law) in this difficult case”.
What’s ‘difficult’ about it? A group of unconscionable predators take advantage of a young girl and repeatedly perpetrate unspeakable acts on her? All of which was proved beyond doubt by DNA. The only ‘difficult’ thing should have been whether to deport them all immediately, or drop them off in the prison showers, bound and gagged, and send the guards off to lunch break for a few hours, first.
The judge, whose hyphenated surname would make both of its more famous namesakes surely turn in their respective graves, should be forcefully reminded of her own words in an unrelated case.
A German court on Thursday convicted a 93-year-old former SS private of being an accessory to murder at the Stutthof concentration camp, where he served as a guard in the final months of World War II. He was given a two-year suspended sentence […]
“How could you get used to the horror?” presiding judge Anne Meier-Goering asked as she announced the verdict. She said that the fact Dey was taking orders didn’t free him from guilt.
Maybe he should have pleaded ‘migration frustration’ instead.
