What Are the UK Police Doing?

OPINION

It’s all on in the UK, where citizens are starting to rail against police refusal to shut down the armed Muslim youth gangs freely roaming the streets. Anyone targeted by Muslim violence or complaining about the problem on social media is threatened with police arrest for ‘hate speech’.

Police were noticeably absent in the following incidents of street violence, considered “legitimate protest” by police.

If the Brits don’t solve the problem of conflating these two separate issues, then civil war is a likely outcome.

The first issue is migration, where the conflict is a consequence of some Muslims despising the British way of life and refusing to embrace it. They have brought sharia law into the UK, threatening Jews with genocide and viewing Christians as subservient dhimmis subject to the Islamic jizyah tax; there is no common ground in these opposing religious values, where Christians forgive their enemies, but sharia law flings homosexuals off tall buildings and cuts the hand off a thief.

Society will tolerate a small invasion, but Muslim numbers are “predicted to increase significantly in the near future when the UK’s share of Muslims in the population could rise from 6.3 per cent in 2016 to 17.2 per cent by 2050”.

Douglas Murray said recently:

“Now, clearly we’ve lost control of the streets. Is it time to send in the army? At some point probably yes, but if the army will not be sent in then the public will have to go in, and the public will have to sort this out themselves and it will be very, very brutal. I don’t want them to live here; I don’t want them here. They came under false pretences. Many of them came illegally and continue to come here illegally. And we don’t want them here, and I’m perfectly willing to say that because it needs to be said.

If I hated Australia, hated the Australian people, hated Australian history, hated the Australian way of life, broke into the country illegally and spent my time trying to undermine Australia – why should I be in Australia? Why? What would I have brought the country? What benefit? What moral benefit? What financial benefit? What social benefit? And the answer is you’d have brought no benefit, so why, why just hope that those people are not in large enough numbers and keep your fingers crossed and put it off for another day? I think we have to start saying, very clearly, ‘If you don’t like it here, go, and if you don’t like it here and intend to make it worse, we will make you go’.”

Now that’s fighting talk but someone’s got to do it when the combined effort of UK politicians, media, police and the judiciary is to ignore public outcry and continue to represent a violent minority under the guise of tolerance and DEI.

The second issue is that of free speech. As Murray points out, it is a legitimate and legal right of British citizens to protest immigration – both legal and illegal – when it threatens personal security and the traditional way of life.

Conflating illegal migration with free speech, to shut down public debate on either issue, because the violent Muslim underbelly will be offended is unacceptable on any level.

Murray is not on the same page as the British police, who are in still in the thrall of DEI: resulting in prissy gender diverse and five-foot-nothing policewomen appointees who are completely useless in a street brawl with louts brandishing knives.

It’s not wrong to question the effectiveness of Muslims appointed to the police, either, given they appear to be unsuccessful in curbing youth violence.

Physically useless DEI police appointees are gainfully employed trawling through social media accounts of British citizens speaking out, following up on community tip offs, and Muslim appointees liaising with imams to defuse further outbreaks of youthful violence.

Threatening citizens with ‘hate speech’ law is a relatively new phenomenon. The Christian in the following video claims his police visit was triggered by a discussion with his local parish priest.

The policewoman soft pedalling their visit said, “People have raised concerns about… your views… that are… you’re concerned about what’s going on in Australia… so what is… what are your concerns? Is there anything that we can help with?”

And the subject of the visit responds with a claim of discrimination. “So, this is religious discrimination, why you’re here now, because you wouldn’t be knocking on Muslim doors...I’m an orthodox Christian. Now you’ve turned up at my house because I went to see my priest...So, because I’ve questioned about the church not acting on the behalf of Christians, you’ve turned up here with mental-health nurses assuming I’m some right-wing nutter?”

He was right to be concerned. The Director of Public Prosecutions of England and Wales defined “racial hatred” as “publishing or distributing material which is insulting or abusive, which is intended or likely to incite racial hatred…so if you retweet that, then you’re republishing that, then potentially you’re committing an offence. And we do have dedicated police officers who are scouring social media. Their job is to look for this material and then follow up with identification, arrests and so forth.”

When the people elected to serve and protect you fail in their duties, then citizens are forced to take matters into their own hands, and this is the conclusion Douglas Murray arrived at, when he said, “the choice for British citizen’s to the influx of Muslims as either as standing up to it or begging from your knees”.