Skip to content

Victoria: Coming for Your Kids

The Groomer State’s school-to-clinic pipeline exposed.

Well, she appears to have transitioned, so why shouldn’t your kids. The Good Oil. Photoshop by Lushington Brady.

Well, Melbourne can shut up with its ‘World’s Most Liveable City’ bullshit. Fair dinkum, it’s like that bloke who scored a try in the under-18s grand final back in the ’80s and is still banging on about it. In 2025 in fact, it’s a contender for the world’s most miserable bloody city. Still, at least they’re not quite as mardy-arsed as… Cork. Take the wins where you can, Melbourne.

If nothing else, Melbourne can… um, proudly?… claim its crown as Groomer City.

Victoria’s curriculum has been ­updated to teach children as young as five that their body parts may not match their gender, and that biologically male students who identify as female are entitled to play sport on girls’ teams.

Concern over the “Respectful Relationships” curriculum, which was quietly amended in August last year, comes as parents and psychiatrists warn of a “school-to-clinic pipeline” for children struggling with adolescence who are persuaded they were born in the wrong body, and pushed towards irreversible and often harmful medical treatment.

Interestingly, teacher training materials leaked to the media show that it is still carries the notorious ‘Safe Schools’ brand. This was the radical gender indoctrination program, created by a Queer Theory think-tank whose former deputy director wrote a series of shocking articles defending paedophilia in the 1980s. The originator of Safe Schools openly bragged that she was here to teach “how to be gay and communist”.

Many parents were no doubt under the impression that Safe Schools had been ditched. Turns out it just scuttled a little deeper into the shadows, hiding under the banner of ‘Respectful Relationships’.

Initiated in 2016 as a response to Victoria’s family violence royal commission, Respectful Relationships is a teaching resource ­designed by the state Education Department with the aim of ­“preventing family violence by promoting gender equality and teaching children about respectful relationships”.

How, exactly, does grooming children into transgenderism teach them about ‘respectful relationships’?

Instead, it seems very much about the rainbow groomers getting their hooks onto children as early as possible.

The revised curriculum for “foundation level” – children in the first year of primary school – includes a case study of a transgender girl called “Stacey”.

“She dresses like the other girls, plays with them and everything seems fine,” the sample lesson plan states. “But one day, Lara says Stacey should be in the boys’ team at sports, not the girls’ team.”

They are advised to tell their students that “Stacey” could respond by saying: “Yes I can play with the girls’ team because I am a girl!”, or “Go and ask the teacher if you don’t believe me. Our teacher says I belong in the girls team.”

Being truthful and saying, ‘Stacey, you’re a boy!’ apparently doesn’t come into it.

Instead, it’s grooming all the way.

The curriculum also seeks to educate the five and six-year-old students about the notion of being transgender, by telling them that “some people feel they did not get a good match for their body parts, and they do not want to be called a boy or a girl, but rather something that is right for them”.

It turns out that former PM Scott Morrison was right about ‘gender whisperers’ lurking in schools.

A spokeswoman for Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress, who the Australian has agreed not to name to protect her child’s privacy, said she and other parents of gender-dysphoric children were concerned that the policy at Victorian schools of affirming children’s chosen genders, often without the knowledge of parents, is ­resulting in them being sent down a path towards irreversible medical treatment.

“The school-to-clinic pipeline is a very real thing,” the spokeswoman said. “When a child presents, particularly at school, with gender distress, gender confusion, the default position of the Education Department, in our ­experience, seems to be that the child must be affirmed, more often than not without parental consent.

We have multiple examples of young people who have been ­socially transitioned at school without their parents’ knowledge or consent, and as soon as they turn 18 they’ve gone to see an ­affirming GP or clinician and they’ve been handed a script for hormones, often based on the fact that they’ve been socially transitioned for a couple of years.”

As groomers caught with their pants down will, the Victorian premier is trying to hide behind a shield of high dudgeon.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has launched a disturbing attack on free and open reporting in a heated defence of a radical push of transgender ideology to five-year-olds […]

“Transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves,” she said. “So whether it is our schooling system or across our health system, supporting those kids and those families should be a priority because it’s the right thing to do.”

Except that Allan is lying harder than a cross-dresser caught loitering in the playground with a bag of lollies in his blouse.

The data Ms Allan referenced appears to come from the website of advocacy group LGBTIQ+ Health Australia, which did not cite its source.

That’s because they just made it up.

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website states “there are … no reliable ­national data on rates of suicide and self-harm among LGBTIQ+ communities in Australia”.

Data from the world’s largest gender clinic, the UK’s Tavistock Clinic, shows that rates of suicide amongst youth referred to the clinic were slightly higher than the general population, and the same amongst those receiving treatment and those who were not.

Even if it was true, it still wouldn’t justify chemically and surgically mutilating vulnerable children. The suicides are not just exaggerated by mendacious activists, but clearly a symptom of gender dysphoria, not a cause. Just as you wouldn’t treat anorexia with diet pills, any doctor who resorts to the thoroughly discredited ‘gender affirmation model’ is grossly negligent at best, at worst a willing mini-Mengele with a rainbow lanyard.


💡
If you enjoyed this article please share it using the share buttons at the top or bottom of the article.

Latest