If President Trump not only goes ahead with his bold vision for breaking the cycle of Arab anti-Semitic violence and dethroning Hamas in Gaza, it will shake the ‘existing world order’ the establishment loves so much. Not only will it demolish their prime cause célèbre, it will expose for all to see the corruption, venality and ultimate impotency of the UN.
Another Trump decision is already threatening to topple one of the biggest pillars of the UN’s corrupt hegemony: the WHO.
Argentina will pull out of the World Health Organisation (WHO), a presidential spokesperson said on Wednesday, after President Donald Trump’s executive order last month to pull the US out of the global health group.
Trump, who Argentina’s libertarian President Javier Milei considers a close ally, moved to exit the organisation on his first day in office on January 20.
Milei ordered Argentina’s withdrawal because of “deep differences” regarding the WHO’s management of health issues, notably the Covid-19 pandemic, presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni said, citing Argentina’s months-long lockdown under the previous leftist government.
Adorni also cited a “a lack of independence from the political influence of other states.”
Meaning, of course, communist China. That the WHO, headed by a ‘former’ revolutionary communist, is deeply in cahoots with the communist superpower was brutally exposed in the aftermath of the Covid pandemic. The WHO and its cronies were not only complicit in the insanely dangerous research that led to the virus’ creation, high-ranking WHO operatives were complicit in the clandestine effort to scrub the evidence and undermine their own ‘fact-finding’ investigation.
Milei was a sharp critic of the lockdown imposed by former President Alberto Fernandez during the pandemic, asserting that it hurt the economy and that the government used it as a mechanism of “repression”.
“Long live freedom,” Milei said on Wednesday in a post on X criticising the UN agency.
Argentina does not receive WHO funding for health management, and the president’s decision doesn’t affect the quality of health services, Adorni said.
“On the contrary, it gives greater flexibility to implement policies adopted in the context of interests that Argentina requires,” he added.
Last year, Milei’s government refused to sign an agreement to manage pandemics within the WHO framework, on the grounds that doing so could affect national sovereignty.
That the WHO is deeply corrupt and unfit for purpose has long been an open secret. Contrary to the wittering of the ‘Follow the Science!’ crowd, the highly respected Cochrane scientific review organisation suspended ties in 2015.
Cochrane, whose reviews are an acknowledged source of knowledge in medicine, because its meta-analyses come from the Cochrane organization’s 3,000 independent physicians and researchers, demanded a fundamental revision of the WHO-system, which, it said, ‘has proven itself weak to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry’.
As always, follow the dirty money.
Ten years ago WHO changed its financial policy and allowed private money into its system, instead of only funding from the member states. WHO has since been extremely successful in raising funds and is now receiving more than half of its yearly budget from private sources. Bill Gates has for example given more than one billion dollars to the WHO. The new system of private funding of WHO has brought WHO much closer to the pharmaceutical industry.
Far from following the science, the WHO nearly fell over itself to follow the money instead.
The results from the Cochrane reviews, which most researchers regard as a much more reliable source of information on medicine than the data coming from the pharmaceutical industry itself, clash harshly with the recommendations of WHO in its drug directories.
The Cochrane meta-analyses have systematically found less effect and more harm from the pharmaceutical drugs than the pharmaceutical industry does, when it documents its own products, also when the industry’s own data is used. Many drugs listed in the WHO drug directories, like “WHOs model list of essential medicines”, have no value as medicine according to Cochrane reviews, since the drugs are dangerous, often harmful, and without significant beneficial effects for the patient […]
it seems that the pharmaceutical industry has gained control over the WHO system, leading to an extreme bias towards the use of not only ineffective and unnecessary influenza vaccines and medicines, but also to the use of antipsychotics, antidepressant, antianxiety and other psychopharmacological drugs, cytotoxic anti-cancer chemotherapy, and a number of other drugs, which according to independent meta analyses and Cochrane reviews are found to be without significant beneficial effect – and often harmful.
The pharmaceutical industry is also one of the biggest advertisers and political donors in the United States.
Is it any wonder the media and establishment politicians are so furious at the WHO’s feet being cut out from under it?
