Skip to content

Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/024

10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You

This is edition 2026/024 of the Ten@10 newsletter.

Hi all,

This is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.

Enjoy!


Rot: Taxpayers are paying for special unlimited paid leave for Māori staff

Ani O'Brien

  • 🐝 Duncan Garner sparked controversy by reporting that Māori staff at Oranga Tamariki can access effectively unlimited discretionary paid cultural leave unavailable to others.
  • 📜 The Oranga Tamariki + APEX collective agreement includes a clause granting paid discretionary leave specifically for “Kaimahi Māori” for cultural obligations such as marae roles, iwi meetings, and performances.
  • ⚖️ The author argues the entitlement is explicitly race-based, taxpayer-funded, and lacks a defined annual cap, making it difficult to budget and govern.
  • 🔄 Although the agreement expired in December 2024, its terms continue to operate in practice until replaced, meaning the provision remains active.
  • 🧾 A PSA memo states cultural obligations are best defined by Māori staff themselves, reinforcing that the leave is open-ended and manager approval is unlikely to be declined.
  • 🕊️ The agreement also includes Māori-specific bereavement provisions (“He Wā Pouri”) that are not time-bound, loosening standard leave rules when tikanga is invoked.
  • 🏛️ Comparisons with other agencies (DOC, Ministry of Education, Te Puni Kōkiri) suggest most embed tikanga and te reo culturally, but tie financial benefits to skills or duties rather than ethnicity.
  • 🌿 However, the Ministry for the Environment also appears to provide Māori-specific leave entitlements and te reo allowances, raising similar governance concerns.
  • 💰 Cost modelling estimates the policy could cost between $1.7m and $10m annually at Oranga Tamariki, depending on uptake and backfill assumptions.
  • 👶 The author argues that redirecting those funds could employ 35–120 additional frontline social workers, increasing support for vulnerable children.
  • 😠 Concerns are raised about workplace resentment, burnout, and potential conflicts with anti-discrimination principles under the Human Rights Act.
  • 🏛️ Minister Karen Chhour inherited the agreement and cannot easily remove the clause without triggering difficult union renegotiations, making reform politically complex.
  • 🔥 The conclusion calls for future renegotiation to remove race-based clauses and potentially legislate against embedding racial entitlements in public-sector agreements.

This post is for subscribers on the VIP tier

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In

Latest

The Good Oil Daily Opinion Poll

The Good Oil Daily Opinion Poll

Take our Daily Opinion Poll and see how your views compare to other readers and then share the poll on social media. By sharing the poll you will help even more readers to discover The Good Oil.

Members Public