This is edition 2026/042 of the Ten@10 newsletter.
Hi all,
This is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.
Enjoy!

1. How asset recycling can help solve the infrastructure deficit
Roger Partridge
- ⚡ The government confirmed it will spend up to $200 million buying new shares in Genesis Energy, officially citing energy security and stronger assets.
- 📜 The real driver is legislation under the mixed ownership model, which forces the Crown to maintain its 51% stake, meaning taxpayers must buy new shares whenever the company raises capital.
- 💰 Private investors were willing to fund the share issue, but the law left ministers with two choices: buy the shares or prevent Genesis from raising capital.
- 🏥 Critics argue the $200 million could instead fund infrastructure like hospitals or water systems rather than preserving a stake in a listed electricity company.
- 🔌 The success of Contact Energy since full privatisation in 1999 is cited as evidence that electricity firms can operate successfully without government ownership.
- 📊 The Crown’s balance sheet totals nearly $600 billion, including around $24 billion in commercial enterprises alongside essential infrastructure like roads, hospitals, and schools.
- 🏢 These state holdings accumulated over decades without a clear strategy, spanning businesses such as Air New Zealand, Kiwibank, New Zealand Post, Television New Zealand, farms, and even the national weather service.
- ❓ This raises a policy question: should billions remain tied up in commercial assets or be redirected toward urgently needed infrastructure?
- 🧠 Treasury Secretary Iain Rennie has warned that New Zealand cannot grow its way out of fiscal pressure and will need balance-sheet changes, including capital recycling.
- 🔁 The The New Zealand Initiative report Renovating the Nation proposes asset recycling—selling non-essential government assets and reinvesting proceeds into infrastructure.
- 🇦🇺 The model mirrors New South Wales, which has raised over A$50 billion since 2012 and funded major projects like Sydney Metro and WestConnex.
- 🏗 Successful asset recycling requires safeguards: proceeds placed in a protected infrastructure fund, spending that adds to existing budgets, and independent project prioritisation.
- 🧭 New Zealand’s New Zealand Infrastructure Commission has identified infrastructure needs but cannot prioritise projects, leaving decisions vulnerable to political pressure.
- ⚖️ Supporters argue regulation—not ownership—protects consumers, with oversight from the Commerce Commission ensuring fair pricing in regulated industries.
- 📉 Critics worry about losing dividends, but proponents argue the sale price reflects those future earnings, while infrastructure investments generate broader long-term economic returns.
- 🗳 With a November election approaching, voters may need to decide whether the government should keep commercial assets or sell them to fund infrastructure upgrades.