This is edition 2026/148 of the Ten@10 newsletter.
Hi all,
This is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.
Enjoy!
1. Democracy Briefing: Anatomy of a failed coup
Bryce Edwards — The Democracy Project
- 🧭 A day after Christopher Luxon survived another push to remove him, Edwards stitches competing accounts (Hehir, O’Brien, Moir, Coughlan, Harman, Lynch and others) into a basic timeline of National’s three-hour caucus crisis.
- 📞 Reporting holds that Chris Penk had been testing support for an Erica Stanford–Chris Penk ticket (Stanford leader, Penk deputy), while Chris Bishop’s name was also in the mix — before anyone had locked numbers.
- 📰 Someone spoke to the Herald; the story went public Monday night, Luxon recalled MPs to Wellington, and a quiet numbers exercise became an emergency confidence fight.
- 📉 Numbers reportedly firmed against Luxon Tuesday afternoon, then peeled back by evening as Stanford and Bishop competed rather than combined; Luxon put his own leadership to a confidence vote before any alternative solidified.
- 🧱 Free portion ends with the core problem: appetite for change without a majority for any particular replacement — and the paywall cuts mid-analysis.
- 🎯 Takeaway: the “coup” failed less because Luxon was loved than because plotters leaked early, couldn’t unite on a candidate, and let the PM force the vote first.
2. National's Bad (Really Bad) Day
Peter Allan Williams — Peter’s Substack
- 💥 Williams calls 12 August 2026 one of National’s darkest days: a poorly performing PM, bungled leadership move, and senior egos put ahead of the country.
- 🎤 He revisits Luxon’s long communications failures — from a flustered Wanaka 100-days answer in 2023 to later brain fades on small business, MMP, TOP, and dismissing the Treaty Principles Bill.
- 🧮 Penk’s numbers exercise either couldn’t count or was leaked after calls; Stanford and Bishop couldn’t yield so one clear alternative never emerged.
- 🚪 Losing Penk from portfolios and as a candidate means another Kaipara ki Mahurangi selection distraction; National’s poll position (1News ~29%) already implies list MPs under threat.
- ⚠️ He frets Opportunity polling ~8% twice in two weeks while Act rises and NZ First slips on bank/rugby stunts and insults.
- 🎯 Takeaway: Luxon stared the caucus down again — but the damage deepens the path to relying on coalition partners, not National strength.
3. Chris Penk took the fall, but here’s what I know.
Ani O’Brien — Thought Crimes
- ⏱️ In one day Penk went from Cabinet (Defence, Building, Veterans, Space, GCSB/NZSIS and more), list rank 14, to stripped of every portfolio after Luxon’s confidence win — then announced he won’t contest November.
- 🧩 O’Brien says the “Penk for PM” story never stacked up; her sourcing is that he was canvassing a Stanford leader / Penk deputy ticket, still at early soundings.
- 🗣️ “Then somebody talked” — a leak to media forced declarations before numbers were locked; Luxon forced confidence first so no vacancy and no alternative ballot followed.
- 🏛️ PMO line to media: Penk challenged for himself; neither Stanford nor Bishop “officially” challenged — while O’Brien’s sources say Penk was stalking-horse, not the caucus challenger, and someone else did challenge (still being corroborated).
- 💔 She accepts Luxon had to make an example, but mourns losing a clever, good-faith conservative workhorse over a leaked, half-formed move.
- 🎯 Takeaway: the public “Penk vanity tilt” narrative is the tidy story; the messier one is a deputy ticket aborted by leak, ego, and PM’s speed.
4. Hang in there, Chris Penk!
Liam Hehir — The Blue Review
- 🐐 Hehir had said there would have to be bloodletting after the ructions; he now regrets the framing because the scapegoat is personal friend Chris Penk.
- 🩸 Portfolio strip (Defence, spies, Building & Construction etc.) he treats as fair politics — head above the parapet, head gets shot at — but not as grounds to quit public life.
- 🐴 Whether or not Penk was meant as stalking horse for “real” contenders, that is how it played: designated patsy drawing fire while bigger names stayed careful.
- 🛡️ Hehir praises Penk as a principled conservative who isn’t awkward or abrasive, a diligent Building minister, and a rare Defence minister with military experience.
- 🗳️ National heads to 7 November with a leader who’s won two confidence votes he shouldn’t have needed, a cautious front bench, and one fewer conservative of conviction in Cabinet.
- 🎯 Takeaway: take the licks for the contest — but don’t write Penk out of politics over a half-cocked crisis he didn’t solely own.
5. CYCLIST COMMANDEERS THE COURT
John McLean — John’s Substack
- 🚴 McLean savages a Post feature lauding Cycle Wellington’s Patrick Morgan for dragging Better Wellington president Paul Heffernan through court under the Harmful Digital Communications Act.
- 💬 The offending anonymous X post on Better Wellington’s page: Morgan’s cycle lobby “would have to be the first against the wall when a decent council” got in — deleted when the account was deactivated in Nov 2025.
- 🧠 He argues Morgan’s “credible death threat” framing is absurd hyperbole for political rhetoric about ditching cycle-lane capture, and that Netsafe process / proof looked shambolic (Heffernan says he never heard from Netsafe).
- ⚖️ Judge didn’t order an apology (to avoid re-amplifying the comment); Heffernan apologised anyway and Morgan rejected it — McLean’s rule: never apologise to bad-faith wokesters.
- 📜 Broader charge: HDC Act, meant for real bullying harms, is being weaponised against robust debate (Portia Mao, MFAT/Israel Institute rows, Rex Landy, etc.) and should be scrapped.
- 🎯 Takeaway: hurty words about cycle lobbies are not a national-security event — they’re free speech being lawyered into silence.
6. No, the far right is not a deadlier threat than Islamism
Charlotte Littlewood — spiked
- 📊 New UK Prevent figures again show extreme-right referrals outnumbering Islamist ones (~8% Islamist) — and Littlewood, a former Prevent practitioner, says that maps the referral machine, not the real threat.
- 🏫 Schools drove 34% of referrals; ages 11–15 were 36% of referrals and 37% of Channel cases. Holiday dips track kids leaving school, not summer peace.
- 🛡️ MI5 still puts ~¾ of CT caseload on Islamist terror; Contest attributes ~67% of attacks since 2018 to Islamism vs ~22% extreme right.
- 👀 Islamist cases peak older (31–40); schools are worse at spotting politicised religion, face intimidation/white-guilt chill, and miss antisemitism as its own cross-cutting hatred.
- 📈 Record 10,293 referrals (+39%) partly reflect post-Southport awareness; “fascination with extreme violence” finally getting attention after Rudakubana’s triple closed referrals.
- 🎯 Takeaway: Prevent stats are a vulnerability map of schools and forms — not proof the far right outranks Islamism as Britain’s deadlier terror threat.
7. The Greta Thunberg of Cambridge
Rocco Loiacono — The Spectator Australia
- 🎓 Loiacono pairs Claudine Gay’s Harvard plagiarism fall with Cambridge’s Jason Arday scandal as DEI ends-justify-means disasters.
- 🏅 Arday was hired (May 2023) as a sociology/education professor and hyped as overcoming autism, late literacy, and adversity — boss Hilary Cremin called his research “the best in the world.”
- 📄 UK Telegraph analysis found ~188 thesis passages identical/very similar to another student’s 2009 thesis; Arday blamed autism/mimicry and cited a pre-viva brain tumour — claims that drew sharp pushback.
- 📚 Other disputed boasts (marathons, Seven Up appearance before he was born, huge charity sums, an unfindable book) met racism/ableism shields; a Times journalist even drew Met interest for probing him.
- 🧯 Arday resigned; Loiacono (with Dominic Green) puts heavier blame on supervisors, referees, and hire committees who skipped due diligence for the DEI narrative — “Greta”-style instrumentalisation.
- 🎯 Takeaway: when identity storyline outruns verification, elite universities don’t just hire a fraud risk — they torch their own standards.
8. The curious case of the wrong feelings
Damien Costas — The Spectator Australia
- 😤 Costas on One Nation’s rise: elites spent years saying lived experience and feelings matter — until voters feel angry about housing, immigration, cohesion, and cost of living.
- 🔁 Hanson voters get coded as fearful/prejudiced/irrational; the same empathy framework used for favoured groups flips to “correction” mode for them.
- 🧠 Feelings aren’t the opposite of thought — they’re often where thought starts when promises diverge from daily reality.
- 🌍 He links the pattern to Brexit, Trump, Reform UK and other Western revolts: decisions without consent, concerns dismissed, frustration explained away rather than heard.
- 🎤 Establishment keeps asking what One Nation voters are “really” saying; Hanson keeps asking why they’re angry — and politics rewards people who ask the forbidden questions.
- 🎯 Takeaway: One Nation is what happens when millions hold the feelings-industrial complex to its own standard.
9. How My Generation Became Antisemitic
Leo Lewis — The Free Press
- 🎒 High-schooler Leo Lewis warns adults: antisemitism among Gen Z peers is worse than they think — Free Press adapts/expands his Substack essay after covering school failures elsewhere.
- ➡️ He flags a newer, mainly right-wing youth strand less understood than left campus hatred, calcifying via memes into an insurgent vibe among young men.
- 🔤 Central vector: reclaiming/weaponising “goy” — from Hebrew for non-Jew into slang implying Jews treat outsiders as cattle; “goy slave,” “goyslop,” viral TikToks about kosher vs deliberately unhealthy food for control.
- 📱 The slang migrates into everyday teen talk (even homework/teachers) among kids who often don’t know the word’s origin — normalisation by meme, not seminar.
- 🧱 Free Press paywall cuts the full “why it flourished / what to do” sections after the lede diagnosis.
- 🎯 Takeaway: if you only watch progressive campus antisemitism, you’re missing a parallel right-meme pipeline recruiting boys in plain sight.
10. I Went No Contact with My Parents. I Regret It.
Christina Buttons — The Free Press
- 💔 Buttons recounts cutting off her parents at 19 (2008) for five years after a therapist branded them “toxic”/“coercive” while she was suicidal — a simple root-cause story she now deeply regrets.
- 📬 As editor sorting Tough Love with Abigail Shrier letters, she sees flood of parents devastated by adult kids who went “no contact,” often after therapeutic framing of normal conflict as abuse.
- 📈 ~10% of the US population estranged from a parent or child; WSJ-noted trend of therapists encouraging cut-offs as “self-care.”
- 🗣️ Therapeutic language now scripts family life: trauma, boundaries, toxicity — sometimes fitting real danger, often over-applied to imperfect but loving parents.
- 🧱 Full personal reckoning sits behind Free Press paywall after the setup and thesis.
- 🎯 Takeaway: before you let a therapist help you amputate family, remember some of us already did — and spent years wishing we hadn’t.
What our members are saying about Ten@10
Elizabeth
These articles are compulsory reading for me and the perfect addition to the usual list of Goodoil items!
Lynne
Absolutely brilliant to receive these current and thought provoking articles.
Jonathan
Just wanted to let you know that I’m loving this new 10@10. Much appreciated from someone who chooses to read/watch almost NO mainstream media.
Murray
Cam, relish your output as the newspaper in Christchurch is so intent on non news. Thankyou
Fred
Thanks for Ten @ Ten, really enjoy reading it.Keep it up. All the best, keep healthy.
Jocko
Wonderful info not otherwise available in NZ. More power to your elbow! Thanks.
