We Can Not Allow a Charter University
In a final irony, due to the loss of this revenue from international tuition fees, half of the lecturers that would not support the UoD lost their jobs. But fortunately, as always, Grant still did alright.
In a final irony, due to the loss of this revenue from international tuition fees, half of the lecturers that would not support the UoD lost their jobs. But fortunately, as always, Grant still did alright.
Matariki, an unpublished manuscript and the abandonment of “peer review”.
If ever there was a policy that is crying out to be campaigned against, this TOP plan, to literally ‘top’ the elderly, is surely it. And it is tailor made for NZ First to take up.
Why do we, the voters, keep falling for this rubbish?
Voila! Layers of staff expenses cut, with sufficient savings thereto attached to ensure the MMC could all keep their jobs. And the irony, that they were, simultaneously, revealing themselves as the next layers of staff that AI would probably replace, was lost on them.
CS&F’s position means that a majority group, namely mothers and wives who serve and love their families, becomes insignificant. Their womanhood becomes not only insignificant but literally meaningless, for if anyone can be a woman then a woman is nothing. Mr Bennett, how’s that for exclusion?
But it is not ‘a little slice of paradise’ for too many of our little ones. A New Zealand child is killed every four to five weeks and hundreds are harmed each year.
Satan is equally content if the malevolent liberalism rampant in our institutions is replaced by an equally malicious conservatism. He does not care how human souls are destroyed, but only that they are.
Alas – despite reaching number one at the box office, AotF was pipped at the post for the Oscar by a remake of “How Green was my Carbon Neutral Valley” (which, after some initial controversy, was accepted as a nominee, despite it being 92 per cent generated by an emissions-heavy AI programme).
The Kiwi cradle. Why we need a ‘Grow NZ Families’ revolution.
The only real answer is the Elon Musk answer of ‘zero-based’ budgeting.
And there you have the answer to the Minister Willis’s conundrum. We can prove that, by simply not employing that extra 14.7 equivalents, we have effectively reduced our theoretical headcount by this number.