Brown Pushes a Digital Health Overhaul
While the minister touts “stronger cybersecurity”, no details were offered about how the system will avoid the failures seen in recent high-profile public-sector breaches.
While the minister touts “stronger cybersecurity”, no details were offered about how the system will avoid the failures seen in recent high-profile public-sector breaches.
The inevitable implosion of Te Pāti Māori, explained by Grok.
Cremin must have faced hundreds of students. How many of them will have been infected with the woke mind virus courtesy of his instruction? How many will have gone on to employment in HR departments, social work, media, education or the public service, taking their destructive views with them?
If New Zealand wants a future worthy of its past, it must restore the principles that built its success: reason, responsibility, enterprise, merit and truth. Nothing else will work – and history shows that nothing else ever has.
This shift reins in mission creep and saves ordinary people from funding the political priorities of activist-leaning councils. It also gives ratepayers clarity. When councils have a narrow, concrete purpose, the public can actually measure performance.
The audience has even less attention span now than ever before. You really do have to stick to something that goes directly to the point and resonates. If you can’t get that through, then you’re stuck.
I could not ethically justify voting for the Libertarian Party. I believe the Libertarian Party is alienating libertarians.
The reality is this: it is cruel and callous to incentivise the birth of otherwise unwanted children. And it is a cruel and callous person who produces a child purely for their own monetary gain.
If the country continues down this path, we should not expect peace, prosperity, or social cohesion. We should expect something much darker.
Politically, pouring ‘cold water’ onto challenging issues in New Zealand is common place – be it the recent police scandal or instances of foreign interference. It’s time to sustain conversations.
The inquiry should have been a reckoning. Instead, it became a shield – protecting institutions rather than illuminating truth.
The story was not entirely unanimous. Out of almost 10 minutes, about a minute was granted to dissent.