Tesla and Edison: The Feud That Wasn’t
Sorry, techbros: your Manichean fantasy just ain’t so.
Sorry, techbros: your Manichean fantasy just ain’t so.
Matariki, an unpublished manuscript and the abandonment of “peer review”.
Time and again, private enterprise and competition deliver results while government scientists simply collect grants.
One of the world’s most influential medical journals has published a review that is largely performative. It raises controversial questions only long enough to defuse them with reassuring conclusions. At best, it reads like marketing. At worst, it’s propaganda.
America’s most vulnerable seniors will once again be used as guinea pigs while the FDA takes years to figure out if the vaccine is actually harming people. Wheeking indeed.
Robert Nola, Michael Corballis and John Werry – have died since the letter was published. But the stand they took alongside their fellow professors Kendall Clements, Dame Elizabeth Rata, Douglas Elliffe and Garth Cooper continues to reverberate in public debate and government policy.
The Sun may not swallow our blue marble in a few billion years, after all.
Data centres or ‘net zero’ – you can’t have both.
The NZPB is not alone. The Real Estate Authority, the Teaching Council and the Nursing Council have all adopted provisions that threaten practitioners with consequences if they don’t toe the ideological line.
Small modular reactors are available now and offer a very constructive way to meet our energy needs. Our energy future is bright. No unreliable wind and solar required.
When a professional body removes a peer-reviewed article because it conflicts with organisational values, the issue is no longer a single publication, but the future of open inquiry, editorial independence, and professional disagreement.
It’s a bit boring, really – and typically paternalistic.
Four months after refusing to review Moderna's application, FDA advisers appear ready to endorse the same vaccine based on largely the same evidence.