Skip to content
The BFD.

China is mounting an impressive and so far successful propaganda war trying to reset perceptions that they are to blame for the global COVID-19 pandemic. They are, of course, being assisted by global media who, despite months of calling the virus variations of the Chinese virus, are now lambasting Donald Trump for telling the truth about the origins of the virus.

Michael Austin writes at RealClearPolitics

While the world fights the coronavirus pandemic, China is fighting a propaganda war. Beijing’s war aim is simple: shift away from China all blame for the outbreak, the botched initial response, and its early  spread into the broader world. At stake is China’s global reputation, as well as the potential of a fundamental shift away from China for trade  and manufacturing. Also at risk is the personal legacy of General Secretary Xi Jinping, who has staked his legitimacy on his technocratic  competence. After dealing with the first great global crisis of the 21st century, the world must fundamentally rethink its dependence on China.

After months of staying holed up in the Forbidden City, Mr.  Xi finally ventured to Wuhan, the epicenter of the virus, to declare victory over the virus as all the makeshift hospitals have been closed.  Yet no one knows if Beijing’s claims that new indigenous cases are  slowing down are true or not, given long-standing doubt about the veracity of any official Chinese statistics, and the party’s failure to act in the early days of the coronavirus.  

The communist government instead is claiming that it has largely controlled the epidemic, even as it suspiciously now blames “foreign arrivals” for new cases of virus. Leaked video  from China shows huge lines at a hospital in Chongqing, for example,  raising questions about just what is happening around the country.  

What Beijing cares about is clear from its sustained war on global public opinion. Chinese propaganda mouthpieces have launched a broad array of attacks against the facts, attempting to create a new narrative about China’s historic victory over the Wuhan virus. Chinese state media is praising the government’s “effective, responsible governance,” but the truth is that Beijing is culpable for the spread of the pathogen around China and the world. Chinese officials knew about the new virus back in December, and did nothing to warn their citizens or impose measures to curb it early  on.

At some point, the world has to react and ask just why it is that Chinese think that eating bats and endangered pangolins is good for anyone and why they maintain their disease riddled wet markets.

Unsurprisingly, China also has enablers abroad helping to whitewash Beijing’s culpability. World Health Organization Director-General Tedros  Adhanom Ghebreyesus refused for months to declare a pandemic, and instead thanked China for “making us safer,” a comment straight out of an Orwell novel. This is the same WHO that has refused to allow Taiwan membership, due undoubtedly to Beijing’s influence over the WHO’s purse  strings.  

Most egregiously, some Chinese government officials have gone so far as to claim that the Wuhan virus was not indigenous to China at all, while others, like Mr. Tedros, suggest that China’s response somehow  bought the world “time” to deal with the crisis. That such lines are being repeated by global officials and talking heads shows how effectively China’s  propaganda machine is shaping the global narrative. The world is quickly coming to praise the Communist Party’s governance model, instead of condemn it.  

The reality is that China did not tell its own people about the  risk for weeks and refused to let in major foreign epidemiological teams, including from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Thus, the world could not get accurate information and laboratory samples early  on. By then, it was too late to stop the virus from spreading, and other world capitals were as lax in imposing meaningful travel bans and quarantines as was Beijing.  

Because of China’s initial failures, governments around the world, including democratic ones, now are being forced to take extraordinary actions that mimic to one degree or another Beijing’s authoritarian  tendencies, thus remaking the world more in China’s image. Not least of the changes will be in more intrusive digital  surveillance of citizens, so as to be able to better track and stop the spread of future epidemics, a step that might not have been necessary if Beijing was more open about the virus back in December and if the WHO  had fulfilled its responsibilities earlier.

China’s failures have directly contributed to our own Government’s failures, even repeating some of them. There must be some accountability and the best way to address that is by looking at reining in rampant and Chinese dominated globalisation.

On the trade side, many foreign corporations already have been reconsidering their  operations in China, due to rampant intellectual property theft and rising production costs; now, they may seriously question how safe it is  to continue to do business in China. Not only is the health of their  employees at risk, but they no longer can be assured that China will be a stable supplier. If coronavirus becomes a seasonal phenomenon, as some  experts predict, then even with a vaccine, new strains of the pathogen will always raise the specter of another out-of-control epidemic overwhelming the party-state’s capabilities and infecting the rest of the world.

More broadly, the pandemic of 2020 has brought doubts about  globalization into the mainstream. Decades of open borders, unceasing  intercontinental travel, study abroad, just-in-time inventory systems, and the like have created unexpected vulnerabilities in populations and economies thanks to unfettered openness. To worry about such weaknesses  is not to adopt a Luddite reactionary stance, but to try and salvage the  bases of the post-World War II global economic architecture.  

Those who assumed that global markets were the optimal economic model and would always work, now have to consider whether globalization is  the best system for dealing with pandemics like coronavirus, let alone  old-fashioned state power plays like China imposed on Japan back in  2010, when it blocked the  export of rare-earth minerals over territorial disputes in the East  China Sea. Perhaps the biggest long-term economic effect of coronavirus  will be on long-standing assumptions about global supply chains.

Because of the way the global economy has developed since 1980, to  question globalization today is in large part to question the world’s  relationship to China. As Sens. Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton have pointed out, America and the world have a prudential responsibility to reconsider their dependence on China.

Time for a reckoning. We need to start seriously looking at supply chains, especially for medical supplies, including drugs.

The world never should have been put at risk by the coronavirus.  Equally, it never should have let itself become so economically dependent on China. The uniqueness of the coronavirus epidemic is to bring the two seemingly separate issues together. That is why Beijing is desperate to evade blame, not merely for its initial incompetence, but because the costs of the system it has built since 1980 are now coming into long-delayed focus. Coronavirus is a diabolus ex machina that threatens the bases of China’s modern interaction with foreign nations, from tourism to trade, and from cultural exchange to scientific collaboration.

Good, there needs to be some accountability. China lied, people died. Time to think nationally not globally, and take back our supply chains.

If you enjoyed this BFD article please consider sharing it with your friends.

Latest