Two years ago we wrote about Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic scenario set in 2025. Today it looks increasingly likely that “Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza” (shortened to HPAI and colloquially known as bird flu) will win the draw as Disease X in 2025. This article examines the evidence.
Convincing humanity that contact with animal food sources is dangerous underlies the One Health biosecurity agenda that is playing out. Claiming wild and domestic birds to be the reservoir and all animal sources including humans as potential casualties, assists in establishing centralised control over all life on the planet. It is no coincidence that centralised control is also the asserted ‘solution’ to the alleged climate change catastrophe.
There are recent reports in the USA of multiple bird flu casualties including a poultry worker, cats at a wildlife centre, wild birds and dairy cattle, across multiple states. Almost simultaneously on the other side of the world, New Zealand’s Ministry of Primary Industries have responded to a different strain of HPAI detected in an Otago poultry farm, where 80,000 birds have been culled.
What is Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza?
Avian influenza is a virus which mainly infects birds. The word pathogenic relates to severity of the disease it can cause. In the case of avian influenza, pathogenicity relates specifically to how severe the illness may be to domestic chickens. In fact, the virus usually results in very mild symptoms followed by long-lasting immunity, negating the need for mass vaccination and/or mass culling.
Influenza belongs to a large family known as Orthomyxoviruses. Influenza A and B are the most common viruses to infect humans. They are contained within an envelope, with eight segments of RNA as their genome. A number of proteins are found on the virus surface including haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). These are used in the naming of influenza strains, and are thought to be the most important determinants of how pathogenic a specific strain may be. Haemagglutinin helps the virus to bind to host cells whilst neuraminidase is important for releasing new viruses from inside the host cell. Learn more at Influenza 101.
As with coronavirus, influenza has high variability, meaning that new strains can evolve quickly. Variation can occur in many of the proteins in the virus’ structure, but is most easily observed in the haemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins on the surface of the cell. Influenza A virus is almost constantly evolving through small changes to one or both of these proteins, whilst less common and more significant changes can occur when different strains of the virus mix, leading to reassortment of the genome segments. This can happen when a cell is infected with two different strains at the same time.
What Does Biowarfare Have To Do With Pandemics?
The variability of RNA viruses such as coronavirus and influenza makes gain of function research appealing to an industry wishing to produce new and profitable health products. If a dangerous virus can be created in the laboratory, then this opens up a market for manufacturing and selling new products. The most profitable products are vaccines, which can be marketed – and/or mandated – to entire populations of humans as well as animals. Antivirals have a more specific market, but still generate profits. Other related products can also be sold en masse, such as laboratory and home kit tests, face masks, air purifiers, hand sanitiser, and more.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher offers evidence of the biowarfare program underway at laboratories in the USA in this recent interview.
This is a multinational, pharmaceutical industry motivated enterprise which must be halted. Hulscher talks about recent propaganda claiming “Disease X” in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), ultimately identified as malaria. The DRC has the second highest number of malaria cases and deaths in the world, with almost 25,000 reported malaria deaths and an estimated 70,000 actual deaths in 2022. Local medical staff are highly skilled and experienced at diagnosing this disease. Why then, in 2024, did less than 400 deaths make international news as a mystery illness?
Interestingly, the outbreak began in October 2024 in Kwango province. At the same time a new WHO-sponsored malaria vaccine was rolled out onto the population of neighbouring Kongo Central province. We have written about the likely gain of function research taking place in DRC previously.
At the same link as this map, find information from WHO on controlling the ‘infodemic’ in DRC. Simultaneously we note the absence of any mention of the serious issue of malaria to the health of the people in this impoverished nation.
Propaganda, Censorship and Active Cover-Ups
According to a March 2023 US Congress Select Subcommittee memorandum, Chief Science Officer at the World Health Organization, Dr Jeremy Farrar, ghost co-authored the infamous paper The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2, which falsely concluded “that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.”
As we have written previously (here, here and here), Jeremy Farrar has close ties to all of the usual pandemic powerbrokers: Wellcome Trust, World Economic Forum, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CEPI and GAVI. He built a fear frenzy in 2004 over avian influenza, and has a history of declaring tyranny to be a valid public health response. Learn more at Unlimited Hangout podcast, Jeremy Farrar and the WHO.
Farrar is one example – perhaps the most powerful at this moment in time – of many interconnected high level criminals engaged in tinkering with viruses to increase their affinity with and pathogenicity against human cells. The simultaneous promotion of fear opens a market for mass pharmaceutical product consumption, and shifts society towards a centralised biosecurity state.
For anyone wishing to cause harm to populations, the medical response to a pandemic – in a climate of media-driven fear – offers a prime opportunity. Lockdowns caused death and destruction across the globe. Dr Francis Boyle, an American law professor who drafted the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, has stated that both the SARS-Cov-2 virus and the so-called Covid ‘vaccines’ are part of a biowarfare program.
Should We Be Worried About Bird Flu?
Bird flu has circulated amongst bird populations, from which it occasionally transmits to animal and human populations (who, without gain of function alterations, it has less affinity for), for hundreds if not thousands of years. As with all RNA viruses, it evolves constantly and it can sometimes cause illness.
Replacing skilled diagnosis, tests can be recommended for entire populations, resulting in extensive profits. Learn how the Covid PCR test generated massive profits for one of its developers at How to Make a Pandemic. Testing is central to the creation of outbreaks and the model is based on medical fraud. Described succinctly by Dr Thomas Binder (at about 55m), a test with a one per cent false positivity rate can create the image of something that does not exist.
The [Vovid] PCR test has 98.6% specificity, so 1.4% false positives… Many people, even “experts”, do not necessarily understand [that] this positivity rate is highly dependent on the prevalence of the virus. If there is no virus around, a prevalence of zero, almost all, all positive tests, are false positive. Imagine if we do a pregnancy test in 1,000 males. The test specificity is 99% so 1% false positives. Then ten men will test positive. One percent. And as the prevalence of pregnancy in men is zero, all these ten positive tests will be false positives.
If bird flu is not circulating but testing is being ramped up, then ultimately an outbreak can be manufactured through testing alone. People such as Leana Wen, Deborah Birx and our own Michael Baker are well aware of this simple epidemiological principle. Understanding the reasons for their dishonesty is for another time, but they are the same reasons that legacy media are now the mouthpiece for government and industry propaganda.
The development and successful marketing of genetic ‘vaccines’ now allows for quick manufacture and sales. Ideology overrules critical thinking with regards to these products, acknowledged by Aaron Siri, Dr Joseph Ladapo and many other leading figures pushing back against the imposition of a biosecurity state based on fear of naturally occurring and invisible life forms. Public health has been distorted, thanks to wealthy sponsorship by powerful beneficiaries of the business model, many of whom are clearly embroiled in criminal activity, into an industry reliant on corrupted research, population surveillance, fearmongering and product sales.
The H5N1 strain of bird flu has been the subject of gain of function (aka biowarfare) research for a number of decades. Patents expert Dr David Martin has stated that there are at least 3,099 patents on H5N1, making bird flu a gold mine for many if a ‘pandemic’ can be generated.
The current USA outbreak has been confirmed as a product of gain of function research conducted at a USDA Poultry Research laboratory in Georgia. The need for an immediate and complete global moratorium on this research is outlined in the World Council for Health 2023 report, Rejecting Monopoly Power Over Public Health. Evidence abounds to support the need for criminal investigations into biowarfare research.
Thankfully biowarfare research appears, to date, to produce ineffectual results. The current H5N1 strain causes mild and short-lived symptoms in humans. Most transmission from birds to humans occurs during the mass culling process, which is a reactive and outdated response with no supporting evidence.
Data is limited on the H7N6 strain recently detected in New Zealand, but once the animals have recovered they have immunity. Culling serves no purpose other than to disrupt the food supply. Mass vaccination of animals and poultry against bird flu has shown to drastically enhance the speed of viral mutation, and the potential for more pathogenic strains.
Governments are stockpiling bird flu vaccines and new vaccines are being developed. One such product is AUDENZ Influenza A (H5N1) monovalent vaccine. The clinical trials for AUDENZ resulted in 11 fatalities amongst vaccine recipients, against one fatality in the placebo group who received saline. In a classic example of the normalisation of scientific fraud, the company conclude with no evidence that this massive difference had nothing to do with their product.
Learn more about the vested interests relating to bird flu at Bird Flu, Fear, and Perverse Incentives.
Questioning Claims of Bird Flu Outbreaks
Wild Felid Advocacy Centre, Washington
It is claimed that 20 big cats at a wildlife sanctuary in Washington State died due to a bird flu outbreak in December. Given the fraud connected to human death attribution during Covid, the cause of these deaths deserves thorough scrutiny. Learn more from John Beaudoin’s work.
What tests were conducted to ensure an accurate diagnosis in these wild cats? Was their feed tested for possible toxic exposures? Were the cats exposed to any potentially harmful interventions or treatments? Were any of the cats deliberately culled? Their website states the need for all volunteers to be vaccinated against Covid. Do they have an animal vaccination policy which may have affected the immune systems of the cats? We wrote to the Wild Felid Advocacy Centre, who claim that all queries will be replied to within two business days. After almost two weeks we have had no response.
Poultry Farm, Otago
An H7N6 strain of bird flu is alleged to have caused an outbreak on a poultry farm in Otago, commencing in early December. In an astounding stroke of coincidence, this outbreak was detected a month after Phase 1 of an HPAI vaccine trial across multiple South Island locations. The trial uses an inactivated vaccine against the H5N3 strain, Poulvac Flufend, manufactured by Zoetis who branched away from their parent company Pfizer in 2012.
It is well documented that mass vaccination with a non-sterilising product such as Poulvac Flufend, results in the emergence and propagation of new viral strains. It is important therefore, to question why, weeks after a vaccine trial in native birds in nearby geographical locations, a new viral strain was suddenly detected in farmed birds? Whilst the Ministry of Primary Industries suggest the outbreak may be a spillover event related to virus detected in birds in Australia, the more likely scenario seems to be a much more local connection. Are authorities investigating the possibility? Are authorities considering the potential dangers of bird and animal vaccination enhancing transmission of more virulent strains?
What Can We Do?
Despite the criminal gain of function research being conducted in biolabs across the globe, there is little and questionable evidence that bird flu is anymore pathogenic (harmful) than it has ever been to animals and/or humans. The risk of contracting bird flu is highest amongst staff employed to cull livestock, recognised as an outdated and unnecessary measure when most animals recover and develop immunity. Symptoms remain mild in humans and the one reported death in Louisiana announced on 6 January was an elderly man with undisclosed underlying medical conditions, obscuring the cause of death.
Maintain your immune health via good nutrition, exercise and mindfulness. Maximise your Vitamin D levels by spending time outside during daylight hours and taking supplements if your levels are low.
Stay informed on the unfolding story and use your own critical analysis skills to determine whether ‘alarmed scientists’ are speaking about health, or promoting an agenda of profit and control. Remain immune to propaganda and psychological operations intended to rally you into complying with more product consumption and nonsensical measures such as donning masks and fearing nature and/or each other.
Inform others of the issue. Contact your local politician(s) and inform them. Only with enough awareness can this corporatised, politicised and highly profitable industry causing societal harm be stopped.
It is a few mutations away from finding the right combination to become communicable between humans, and a novel influenza virus may cause sickness and death. This is as true in 2024 as it was in 100,000 BCE — bird flu has been a looming threat to humans for as long as there have been humans.
Dr Karl Jablonowski, senior scientist, Children’s Health Defense.
This article was originally published by the New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science.
