Here’s a drinking game for you: read an MSM article about young men and take a shot every time Andrew Tate’s name comes up. Double shots if the article is written by a woman or quotes women ‘experts’ almost exclusively. You’ll be shitfaced in 10 minutes.
On the other hand, take a drink every time a chattering elite prattling about young men, Tate and ‘misogyny’ mentions the far more prominent equal-and-opposite, the ‘femcel’ misandrists like Clementine Ford. You’ll be sober as a judge.
Yet, contrary to Tate, the likes of Ford, who has openly called for killing men, and wished that more men had died from Covid, is not just feted by the media and promoted by the state. The misandrist hater is showered with taxpayer-funding, and her hateful books are piled onto school library shelves (about the only way she can sell any).
Consider even the ridiculous, racist, misandrist taradiddle, Adolescence. Ignore, if you can, its complete defiance of reality, in portraying white, working-class boys as a unique threat to women, and the perpetrators of knife-violence in Britain. There’s far more problematic garbage to this cretinous woke fantasy morality-tale.
As Carl ‘Sargon of Akkad’ Benjamin has pointed out, one mind-boggling scene has a middle-aged female psychologist grilling a teenage boy about, not just his feelings, but about his sexual history. Seriously?
As I always say, when it comes to such crap: flip the script. Imagine a middle-aged man interrogating a 13 year-old girl about her sexual activity. ‘Inappropriate’ doesn’t begin to describe it.
And the chattering elite wonder why young men are turning to so-called ‘masculinity influencers’.
Almost seven in 10 Australian men aged 16-25 are regularly engaging with masculinity influencers, new research finds, shifting their health behaviours and moulding their views on traditional gender roles.
The new study from The Movember Institute of Men’s Health gathered responses from more than 3000 16 to 25-year-old men in Australia, Britain and the US, finding 63 per cent regularly engaged with at least one masculinity influencer online. In Australia, the proportion was 68 per cent.
The most common demographic engaging with these masculinity influencers is white, university-educated, full-time employed young men from high-income households, the report, Young Men’s Health in a Digital World, finds.
OK – and so what?
Does the article name-drop Tate? Oh, you betcha.
The report doesn’t name individual masculinity influencers, but the most well-known in this space offering advice to men are Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan. There’s also former athlete US Navy SEAL David Goggins, who advocates a warrior mindset to make yourself immune from pain.
What do any of those even have in common, apart from being male?
But here’s the kicker: ‘Movember’ is supposedly a men’s health movement. Yet, who is their ‘Young Men’s Health Research Fellow’?
Report co-author Krista Fisher.
Once again: flip the script. Let’s try to imagine, if we can, what would happen if men were running a ‘Young Women’s Health Research’ body? The howls of outrage would be deafening.
And rightly so.
What, after all, would a man really know about the health, especially mental health, of young women and girls?
No more than a woman could possibly understand young men and boys.
Young men and boys whom they’ve been trying to feminise for decades. Trying to force boys to sit still and quiet. To talk about their ‘feelings’. To ‘hug it out’ and ‘cuddle’.
That’s girl stuff. And boys know it – and hate it.
Worse, these same women tell boys that their very boyishness is ‘toxic’. Boys have been forced to stand up at school and apologise for being male.
And they wonder why boys are telling these feminist harpies to stick it.
The report also found young men who regularly engaged with masculinity influencers were significantly more likely than those who didn’t to believe men should be providers, bosses and the heads of their families.
And these young men had more negative views about women and feminism. Some 70 per cent of those who watched influencers agreed or strongly agreed that “women have it easier than men”, compared with 49 per cent of those who didn’t.
The report pointed out that combined, this meant that 62 per cent of all men this age believed women have it easier than men.
Maybe because they do?
Boys trail girls in four of the five domains in the National Assessment Program, and the gap is widening every year. The only domain where boys outperform girls is numeracy – and there’s a concerted effort in the 90 per cent female education bureaucracy to reverse that, too.
Young men are markedly less likely than young women to hold a BA degree or higher: another steadily widening gap. Young men are 3 per cent more likely to be unemployed than young women. Even the traditionally male domain of trades apprenticeships is in rapid decline. Men are nearly twice as likely as women to be homeless.
Not inconsequentially, young men are up to 400 per cent more likely to die by suicide than women.
So, tell us again how women don’t have it easier than men?
And these highly-paid, bourgeois, femsplaining women wonder why young men would rather listen to Jordan Peterson tell them to clean up their rooms, stand up straight, and take responsibility for themselves? Gosh, how toxic.
