Table of Contents
The long-awaited The Rape Gang Inquiry Report, a crowd-funded, survivor-led report commissioned by Restore Britain’s Rupert Lowe has landed. And it’s every bit as jaw-droppingly horrifying as we dreaded. The details of what was done to white working-class little girls are more awful than anyone could have believed. I don’t exaggerate when I say it’s the sort of stuff that would keep any decent human awake at night.
I won’t dwell on those details, except for some excerpts I’ll put at the end of this post. Just be warned.
The report was commissioned in the first place because, as its introduction says, “there was a demonstrable lack of political will to confront” the scandal. That lack of will spans decades – and it’s still going (as, all too likely, are the child rapes). Almost every facet of the British state and civil society failed catastrophically, possibly for over half a century, to protect innocent young girls from almost solely Muslim predators. The police, the social services, schools, the NHS and the government are all complicit, either by neglect, or, horrifyingly, by participation. The legacy media couldn’t have been less interested.
Here’s the briefest summary of its findings:
The Rape Gang Inquiry examined the systematic targeting of vulnerable girls, overwhelmingly White British, by predominantly Muslim Pakistani gangs across towns and cities throughout the United Kingdom. The evidence put to the inquiry confirms that this scandal constitutes one of the most horrendous failures in the history of the country. Organised networks of perpetrators built coordinated operations that transported victims between locations, supplied them with drugs and alcohol, recorded abuse for distribution and blackmail, and passed girls between multiple adult men. These crimes have been committed for decades, since the 1950s by Pakistanis in particular, and have affected every region of our nation.
The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.
The true number is probably higher.
Confronted with such damning evidence, the cowards and deniers are resorting to trying to dispute the quarter-million victims number. But, as American academic Wilfred Reilly points out, that’s about the weakest attempt at rebuttal imaginable. The 250,000 figure comes from taking the number of cases in one paradigmatic area, Rotherham in Yorkshire, over a 15-year period, and extrapolating, both over the entire UK and the past 70 years in which the gangs have been known to operate. Argue over that as they will, but when the dispute comes down to, ‘250,000? Nah, it was 100,000, tops,’ just what, exactly, is their point? When the margin of error is in the tens of thousands, that doesn’t minimise the issue: it underscores just how horrifying it really is.
As Reilly concluded: Git a rope: there’s still no reason to sneer at this.
The child rapists were horrifying systematic.
The method used to groom children typically followed the same process. Girls as young as 11 were initially befriended by a young Muslim man who then treated the young child like an adult and would then start providing them with alcohol, drugs, and cigarettes. After a few months the girls would then be collected from school gates, care homes, and streets in taxis. They were taken to houses, flats, restaurants, and hotels where they were raped repeatedly by groups of men, tortured, filmed for blackmail, and told they were “white trash” or “kufar” who merited punishment. Many became pregnant while still children. Some miscarried under trauma, others endured coerced abortions, and some gave birth to children who were later removed by the state. We found that the same unspeakable crimes occurred in at least 149 local authority districts – close to 40 per cent of all such districts across the United Kingdom. Survivors described daily rapes, “red rooms” of extreme torture, trafficking between cities, and institutional disbelief that compounded their suffering. Some girls were even trafficked to the Middle East where they would endure Islamic marriage.
The demographic and cultural drivers are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working class girls, as property available for sexual use. This pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam.
I’ll examine those in a separate post. But note that hard reports of Pakistani rape gangs date back to 1955: in other words, Muslim immigrants set about raping white British children almost as soon as they set foot in Britain.
The institutional failures were just as horrifyingly systematic.
“You can’t describe them as Asian men because that’s racist. You should just be glad your child is being taught a different culture” – social worker.
Police forces ignored repeated reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail [and, in same cases, took active part in the child-rape gangs]. Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers.
As for Britain’s bewilderingly sanctified NHS, the failures there were even more damning.
The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care.
All of those are by definition evidence of a crime. Even if – and that’s a big if – the NHS staff thought the girls were willing participants, it was still a crime. Having sex with a child under 16 in Britain is a crime, willing participant or not. There are no ifs or buts about it: every nurse, doctor, or clerk in the NHS who knew of children with STIs or pregnancy had direct evidence of a crime and didn’t report it.
Some police and social workers accused the victims of being child prostitutes: which is also a crime. A crime which they knowingly ignored.
Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them. Taxi licensing authorities renewed permits for drivers who formed the logistical backbone of the networks and collapsed in the face of organised protests when basic safety measures were proposed.
Fewer damnations are harder than that of the state that failed, in its most basic duty, to protect its own citizens.
Political failure lies at the heart of the scandal. Successive governments lacked the will to confront the ethnic and religious patterns. The Labour Party bears particular responsibility. It initially refused a public inquiry and only relented under pressure by ordering a process viewed with widespread scepticism.
Labour-dominated councils and MPs were briefed on the gangs long ago yet later denied knowledge. The party prioritised electoral reliance on Muslim voting blocs and then blocked or watered down inquiries, suppressed ethnicity data, and framed legitimate concerns as ‘far-right’ agitation.
Here’s where I advise you to stop reading if you want to sleep tonight.
READER ADVISORY
The specifics of some of the testimony drives home the horror harder than any amount of statistics. Be warned, though, it’s some of the most horrifying stuff you’ll read.
Chloe
On one occasion, Chloe was abducted by an abuser – who was driving drunk – and taken to a graveyard. He gave Chloe – still twelve years old – whiskey before forcing himself on her and raping her. He withdrew before ejaculation, and forced the empty whiskey bottle into Chloe’s vagina, where it shattered. Chloe admitted herself to A&E, but no questions were asked about how she had sustained such an injury. She was examined, the glass was removed, and she was discharged […]
[A] social worker instead told Chloe that the producers of Emmerdale were looking for a young actress to play a victim of child sexual exploitation, and asked whether she would be interested in auditioning for the role given her experience.
Fiona
At 14, Fiona was abused by a man known as ‘Rambo.’ He had entered Britain illegally in the back of a lorry. Previously castrated in Pakistan as punishment for child abuse, he had then fled to the Philippines, where he allegedly attacked multiple women and children with a large knife – the origin of his nickname. Rambo was locked in a room with two girls and subjected them to extreme sexual torture. This case illustrated that, in some instances, the sexual abuse of children was driven more by humiliation and control than by sexual gratification […]
On one occasion, a police officer returned Fiona to the house where the abuse was occurring and told the men to “have fun with her.”
Boys were also victims.
Wallace
Wallace recalls seeing other boys and girls present who were usually restrained and drugged. He also recalls being drugged himself and losing consciousness. He would often wake alone or with other abused children, disoriented and distressed. This has caused long-term psychological damage.
Marie
[Marie] had bottle tops opened up inside of her vagina, then made to drink what was in the bottle when she was primary school age… The abuse she experienced included extreme sexual violence and degradation. She was raped repeatedly over the years, including anal rape. She was subjected to penetration with objects. She was urinated on. Her legs were held open. She was bitten on the back, cut on the leg and strangled. She has lasting injuries […]
Between leaving school and joining college, at seventeen, she was groomed by a 55-year-old police sergeant.
Lilly
After moving onto the council estate, trouble began immediately. One older boy attempted to take Lilly’s hand from her mother when she was five years old. Her mother reported it to the police, but it was treated as a joke. Years later, the same person went on to rape a three-year-old […]
Lilly herself was groomed and repeatedly abducted and raped by a man from the age of six. He threatened to harm her sisters if she spoke.
Lilly’s sister was sexually abused by her own social worker at age twelve.
Kate
She was transported to a remote location, and held in a caravan for “approximately nine days.” During this period, she reports that she was subjected to repeated sexual violence, severe physical assaults, and sustained torture – including being raped by a dog as the men placed bets on whether it would penetrate her vagina or her anus, filmed, and forced her to rewatch the footage [..]
Kate was repeatedly subject to racially and religiously motivated, and “being white was repeatedly used as a justification for the abuse or to minimise or dismiss the harm being inflicted.” Kate was verbally attacked and demeaned because of her religion, including being mocked for wearing a cross […] Comments were constantly made suggesting that white girls and Christian girls were viewed as having degraded moral character or lower value, whereas Muslim girls were described by some of the men as having dignity and higher moral standing.
“We were in the punishment room when another girl was brought in. The men stated that she had reported one of them to the police and needed to be taught a lesson. I then witnessed an iron being used on the girl’s back while it was hot. I remember seeing severe burns and skin damage to her back […]
My recollection is that the girl later died. I remember seeing her being strangled afterwards in that room […] I witnessed a serious violent incident involving a man I believed to be a police officer. I remember his face and name. A girl was shot in front of me.”
“One of them talked back to the guy who was going to buy them and he snapped and stabbed her over and over and beat her. Then he set her on fire and made us all watch.”
“I remember witnessing severe abuse directed towards the baby while the mother was forced to watch. I recall seeing cigarettes being put onto the baby. The woman was white, the baby was of mixed heritage. These men then killed the baby.”
