Table of Contents
Dr Guy David Hatchard
Guy is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He received his undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex and his Ph.D. in Psychology from Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield Iowa. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. His published work uses the statistical methods of the physical sciences to analyse social data.
In France, one young man has been deliberately shot and killed, apparently by a rogue policeman. Emmanuel Macron is contemplating whether to declare an emergency because of the widespread rioting, which is tied to police brutality against ethnic minorities. At least Macron knows he is facing an emergency.
This article is available as an Audio file and a PDF document.
In New Zealand (and elsewhere, including France), not one but one hundred extra people are dying each week, but our politicians are deliberately looking the other way, and even claiming it is not happening. As a result, there is a curious sense of unreality affecting everyone. Many still argue our voting choices later this year could avert an impending disaster, but in actual fact, it has already arrived.
In our last release, How Political Ideology, Scientific Hubris, and Pharmaceutical Greed Sealed the Fate of Billions we touched on widely circulating talk indicating blow outs in disease rates. We get reports almost daily of unusual health events. Yesterday someone wrote to us about a young professional woman who collapsed in the street with a seizure. No previous history of illness. The ambulance took an hour to arrive because the service is so overloaded.
The Herald online edition led yesterday afternoon with “A&E crisis: Senior doctor’s plea – ‘Everyone’s getting burnt out. We’re exhausted.” which reveals emergency departments are under unprecedented strain. So there is a health emergency in full flood, but why? The government, the loyal opposition, and the health service are keen that we don’t connect the dots and just meekly exercise our right to Hobson’s choice at the next election.
RFK Jr. Dismantles Doctor’s Pro-Vaccine Stance
Fortunately, on the wider political front, it is not all doom and gloom. There is some good news from America. Robert F Kennedy Jnr., who has declared his candidacy for president, has been featured prominently in the media. Despite attempts to discredit him because of his cautious views on vaccine safety, early polls show he is more popular than either Biden or Trump.
In a telling exchange at a town hall meeting chaired by mainstream media personality Elizabeth Vargas, Kennedy showed how adroit he is at revealing and parrying prejudice.
Kennedy is a skilled litigator. He is able to quote published science in the course of debate. Kennedy ran rings around Vargas, who believed that the long term effects of vaccines were fully investigated by pre-release placebo-controlled trials. Kennedy knew this was baseless fiction widely spread by pro-vaccine interests, and he had the references to prove it. Vargas was left adrift at sea. She was sure she was right, but had no idea why. She hadn’t done her research.
Kennedy’s point was that a lot of people think they know what is true and what is false about vaccine safety simply because they have been repeatedly schooled by so-called authority figures and organisations like Fauci and the CDC. He pointed out this can be the rule of propaganda, rather than the rule of knowledge. When there is money to be made, people lie, even the authorities.
You can catch up with Robert Kennedy’s views and homey style via a number of interview’s posted on YouTube and Rumble with people like Carlson, Rogan, or Bill Maher. His landmark speech on US foreign policy in New Hampshire is also very revealing. He remembers the ominous lessons of history, they are part of his personal family history. Kennedy is a bright light on the horizon, he is prepared to tackle previously taboo subjects in an open and scientific fashion. Something for which our politicians are currently scoring an F grade.
You might contrast Kennedy’s approach with this vacuous drivel from our local Whangarei MP, Dr. Emily Henderson. She writes 578 words for us in the Northern Advocate without actually telling us what she is writing about. Whatever it is Henderson is talking about, her universal solution of pulling together is waffle. In reality, Henderson is famous around here for refusing to dialogue with anyone with questions about vaccine safety. Surprising really, considering her PhD topic at the University of Cambridge was ‘cross-examination in jurisprudence’.
Open Dialogue Can Be Downright Embarrassing
I have a suspicion why Henderson might be stone walling questions. Open dialogue can be downright embarrassing. On Twitter, there has been a major eruption of fury because malaria has been found in mainland America in Texas and Florida, the same places where Bill Gates’ genetically modified mosquitoes have been released in their millions. This was part of an on-going programme funded by Gates for over 10 years which is supposed to banish malaria from the world. It hasn’t.
The fun started when among other Twitter bloggers @TexasLindsay and @TheChiefNerd began to dig up not just the hype Gates has been promoting for more than 10 years promising malaria eradication through genetic modification, but also the scientific concerns voiced at the time. Low and behold, scientists suggested that the Gates programme would eventually lead to mutated mosquitoes which would promote the spread of malaria more effectively.
You will appreciate that this is relevant to the safety of genetic modification (Chris Luxon, David Seymour, and Chris Hipkins take note). As such, it was bound to raise the ire of tame fact checkers. Associated Press weighed in on cue by splitting hairs. They noted that whilst the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ‘supported’ Oxitec (the company releasing modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas) with money, that doesn’t actually quite fit the definition of ‘funding’ the particular work being done in the US. AP also pointed out that the Florida malaria cases occurred 280 miles away from the site of the experiments as if mosquitos can’t fly or ride the wind.
Whatever is going on here, it is not being controlled. A deep dive into the Twitter threads linked above will show you that the Gates mosquito programme has never achieved any of its promised results, just as genetic modification of animals in New Zealand has been a dead end and the cause of cruel suffering. No worries though, Gates is not just funding genetic modification of mosquitoes but also has a bet each way with his malaria vaccines. A win win investment strategy for the man with a deep interest in population control (and money).
But just where could the modification of mosquitoes really be taking us?
In our last release, we discussed the known possibility of general system collapse following genetic modification and editing. We suggested that this might be related to the record levels of excess deaths in New Zealand (yes, they are happening). We pointed out that genetic structures are highly complex, evidenced by the trillions of atomic placements and relationships involved.
There is another way to consider this. These placements and relationships are highly specific, precisely because they support the highly specific capabilities of human physiology and psychology as well as the general stability.
The long standing notion that replacing or editing targeted genes will not undermine the other genetic characteristics of organisms that make them what they are and enable them to function as such, is a belief rather than a matter of science. A belief that increasingly looks misguided and dangerous. Using mRNA vaccines, biotechnology has blundered into the genetic modification of what it is to be human.
As our newspapers characterise the unrest in France as the Brink of Total Anarchy, a sort of general system collapse of society, we might also contemplate what has changed in the last three years that has brought us to the brink? It is not a million miles away from biotechnology.
New Zealand and the world is in the midst of an unprecedented health emergency. There is no point in voting for anyone or any party in October who refuses to discuss this with reference to published science and actual data, or even denies its existence.
