Skip to content

Parent taken to court as Seymour ramps up school truancy crackdown

“The truth is that a lot of people want to get to school, but if you're a ‘won't’ rather than a ‘can't’, then we are going to throw the book at you.”

Table of Contents

Summarised by Centrist

The government is prosecuting at least one parent over a child’s chronic school absence, as Associate Education Minister David Seymour moves to enforce truancy rules more aggressively.

Seymour said the case shows the government is serious about using “coercive power” where parents fail to get children to school.

“The truth is that a lot of people want to get to school, but if you’re a ‘won’t’ rather than a ‘can’t’, then we are going to throw the book at you,” Seymour said.

The Ministry of Education has been formally notified of 34 non-attendance cases. 

Seventeen were resolved before prosecution, mostly after parents re-enrolled their children, while 16 remain under active investigation.

The ministry says prosecution is a last resort and only follows attempts at support. It will not prosecute parents who are genuinely engaging with schools, or where absence is linked to chronic illness or disability-related health conditions.

Parents can be fined up to $300 for a first offence and $3,000 for a second or later offence.

The crackdown comes as term one attendance rose to nearly 70 per cent, the highest term one figure since 2020, but still four points below pre-COVID levels in 2019.

Seymour says progress will require “sustained work”. For the government, the message is clear: chronic absence is no longer being treated as a private family matter when parents are seen as refusing, rather than unable, to get children into class.

Read more over at RNZ

Receive our free newsletter here

Latest

Good Oil Backchat

Good Oil Backchat

Please read our rules before you start commenting on The Good Oil to avoid a temporary or permanent ban.

Members Public