Skip to content

Samuel Paty Was Murdered for a Lie

How a fabricated ‘hate crime’ led to a very real one.

Samuel Paty: murdered for a lie. The Good Oil. Image credit: Human Rights Service.

The database fakehatecrimes tracks a phenomenon that has grown in recent years: minority groups faking so-called ‘hate crimes’. Perhaps most notorious is small-time actor Jussie Smollet’s obviously ludicrous tale of supposedly being assaulted by “white Trump supporters”… who turned out to be two Nigerian brothers in whiteface, paid by Smollett himself.

The list goes on: fake hate messages on gay cakes, black activists painting swastikas on their own houses and, it seems most often, Muslims claiming to be victims of ‘Islamophobia’.

Invariably, the media hysterically repeat the bogus claims without question. Sometimes with the most serious consequences.

The Muslim schoolgirl who accused her teacher of Islamophobia and began rumours that led to a jihadist decapitating him in the street in France has admitted lying and apologised to the victim’s family in a remarkable court hearing today.

It was just over four years ago that history and geography teacher Samuel Paty was stalked and murdered by Muslim ‘asylum seeker’ Abdoullakh Anzorov.

Anzorov tracked down 47-year-old Paty and brutally hacked his head off after seeing pictures and videos of him circulated on social media as part of a ruthless campaign of harassment.

A campaign based entirely on yet another Muslim deceit.

It began after the schoolgirl in question claimed that Paty had ordered Muslim students to leave his classroom while he showed the rest of the class caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad by satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo.

But she revealed today that she had not even been present in the class and invented the lie, fearing repercussions from her parents after she was suspended two days for bad behaviour.

Yet, for causing the death of an entirely innocent man, she remains free and even protected.

The student, who was 13 at the time of the murder and whose identity remains protected due to her age, cried as she addressed Paty’s family.

Spare us the crocodile tears.

After Paty's murder, she was taken into police custody, during which time she continued to lie. ‘My teacher had been decapitated, my father was in police custody, I couldn’t say it was false,’ she said.

She finally confessed the truth after 30 hours and two police interviews.

Couldn’t? More like wouldn’t.

The schoolgirl’s father, Brahim Chnina, is accused of launching the online harassment campaign against Paty, while other teen students were tried last year after they identified him for the attacker in exchange for a few hundred euros.

Anzorov, who had requested asylum in France and travelled more than 60 miles to cut down Paty in public, was killed by police shortly after the murder near the school in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine west of Paris.

So, what stern punishment was meted out to those who must have known what a violent reaction their lies would provoke?

The schoolgirl received an 18-month suspended sentence for the slanderous allegations she made against Paty that ultimately proved the catalyst for his murder.

Her five co-defendants, all of whom were aged 14 or 15 at the time of the murder, faced charges of criminal conspiracy with the aim of preparing aggravated violence.

Four were handed suspended sentences but one received a six-month term with an electronic tag after being identified as the person who pointed Paty out to Anzorov […]

Seven men and one woman are appearing at the Special Assize Court in Paris amid the trial over his murder, which is set to last until December 20.
Chnina is one of them, facing charges of association with a terrorist organisation for his alleged involvement in the online campaign targeting Paty.

Import the Third World, become the Third World. The question is whether anyone in positions of power will learn anything from this.

Thibault de Montbrial and Pauline Ragot, lawyers for Mickaelle Paty, one of the sisters of the murdered teacher, said his killing had highlighted the ‘depth of Islamist infiltration in France’.

The trial should ‘allow our society to become aware of a mortal peril’, they added.

Should.

What will almost certainly happen instead is that we’ll all be treated to another round of bullshit lectures about the so-called ‘peaceful majority’.


💡
If you enjoyed this article please share it using the share buttons at the top or bottom of the article.

Latest