Why I Disagree With This
Whether tribalism is along gender or ethnic lines, it discourages, if not extinguishes, freedom of thought and speech.
Whether tribalism is along gender or ethnic lines, it discourages, if not extinguishes, freedom of thought and speech.
Digital backdoors must be recognised as a threat to your privacy, security and, most importantly, freedom.
We cannot in good conscience let this situation continue. I for one refuse to let it happen in my own backyard. I think it’s about time more of us started speaking up.
Someday soon, we will find ourselves subjects in a digital gulag, constantly monitored and judged and always one little misstep away from being cast out into digital exile.
They’re no longer universities in any meaningful intellectual or moral sense. They are anti-universities. They are cognitive enclosures: accredited zones of pre-approved ideas and ideologically screened emotions. These curated mind spaces are committed not to inquiry, but to orthodoxy.
The successful outcomes in the UK cases contrast with the unsuccessful case here. Sex realists have to hope that the success of their UK counterparts may yet influence local events.
Therefore, it is crucial that we remain alert to global digital regulation trends and actively defend freedom of expression, avoiding the adoption of European models, as freedom is lost gradually, slice by slice, through centralized decisions.
New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters has called for answers over the taxpayer funding of FACT Aotearoa, now under scrutiny for potentially breaching the Charities Act by campaigning against the party during the election.
The liberty to be anonymous online is worth protecting, not because anonymity is an absolute good, but because the alternatives proposed by the state are far worse.