The Results of Australia’s C-19 Inquiry
Trust eroded by ‘heavy-handed’ measures, calls for CDC and new ‘pandemic’ strategy.
Trust eroded by ‘heavy-handed’ measures, calls for CDC and new ‘pandemic’ strategy.
The HHS must take its findings seriously if there is any hope for public health to regain public.
Our legal advice suggests that the secrecy requirements contained in an NDA, depending on its terms, may be challenged in the courts and could be deemed illegal. Certainly any attempt to silence people adversely affected by a public health initiative appears to run contrary to New Zealand law.
There is an unwritten rule on this – only establish an inquiry when the outcome is either already known or won’t do great harm to the government.
When important information is kept secret, it can lead to rumours and misinformation. Releasing the contract prevents speculation, promotes clear, factual communication and reduces panic or distrust.
Our position is that the GS and the way it has been used, as well as actions taken by MCNZ with respect to ivermectin, have harmed both New Zealanders and the profession of medicine, perhaps irrevocably.
While Coster acknowledged these findings, he maintained that the police only escalated their response “when necessary”, adding that their approach brought about “the safest resolution that could have been achieved.”
This is a victory of people power against dominant forces and should buoy us all during whatever turbulent times lie ahead.
The ‘Safe & Effective’ roadshow explores vaccine injuries and offers solutions.
The absence of mainstream journalists at the court appearance of doctors challenging their regulator is noteworthy. This situation underscores the critical importance of transparency and accountability in the healthcare sector.
The aftermath of the pandemic is being examined by these gentlemen.
Our legal friend has received no reply to his two messages to an acquaintance, a senior National Party staffer.