On one hand the state says they can impregnate at will and bear no responsibility. On the other, an Appeal Court judge, mopping up after the too-common horrible aftermath, claims there is responsibility. But it’s not one enforceable by law.
The Gene Technology Bill seeks to institute a revolution and it spits in the face of the public who suffered during the pandemic and who voted in a new government with the thought that things might change.
Court intellectuals construct a deterministic history in which only facts that help the case count as relevant facts.
A drunk dud judge attacks Winston Peters at a private function, and she’s in charge of the Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court!
The rules will apply to more than 100,000 companies from around the world, from the largest social media platforms to ‘very small’ providers of entertainment, dating, gambling and other online services.
The manslaughter trial of Daniel Penny and the cold-blooded assassination of a healthcare CEO both deserved the saturation coverage and commentary they received.
We need more lawyers like Anna de Buisseret fighting for the future of humanity.
The ACT is a redoubt of the Long March left – and it shows.
Right to Life with other pro-life groups supported the annual National March for Life on Saturday 7th December.
Stunning court victory vindicates conservative MP, leaves Vic Libs on a knife-edge.
The outcome could affect 23 states that have shielded children from these destructive procedures.
Alvin Bragg pursued another politically charged prosecution – and notched up another loss.
The Supreme Court has escalated the battle, not only by failing in its duty to interpret the law as parliament intended, but also by deliberately undermining the coalition government’s attempt to legislate to fix the law.
Jan 6 arrests and prosecutions are still ongoing, possible pardons or not.
This reveals a disturbing pattern: our highest court is reshaping the law based on judges’ perceptions of changing social values.
