Blobudsman Shows His True Colours
New Zealand’s Chief Ombudsman unlawfully sides with the forces of opaqueness and censorship.
New Zealand’s Chief Ombudsman unlawfully sides with the forces of opaqueness and censorship.
The two pieces are an interesting example of how two people can present the same event quite differently.
Check out the latest media stuff ups both locally and around the world.
The Ayatollah Whatsisname must be in a bunker directing everything and not dead like the fake Israel media is reporting.
We do not need government move-on orders to clean up Auckland from Chloë Swarbrick’s hobos. We just need to re-home them with anyone who says move-on orders are terrible.
What has happened to our free press and their once fervent support for the freedom to speak and write?
The Grauniad is clearly furious that a drug kingpin is dead.
The legacy media go all-in to save the Liberals and fend off One Nation.
Media ignore White House event honouring the innocent slain.
Andrew is low-hanging fruit thrown to the low-IQ mob.
The taxpayer-funded ‘Lanyard Class’ really do think they’re a law unto themselves.
It seems hard to believe that, with its resources, Stuff can’t present the readers of its papers with a more compelling editorial product. I’m therefore forced to the conclusion that the company is run by people who don’t care much about newspapers.
The motivations to stop using X – be it media or now the Clerk of New Zealand’s parliament – are couched in moral terms by opponents, but it’s all really about control, curation, and censorship.
Can we stop pretending there is no correlation between transgenderism and dangerous mental instability?