Some Ideas To Reform the Scientific Enterprise
Matt Kaplan has offered ideas for what could be done to promote the scientific endeavor.
Matt Kaplan has offered ideas for what could be done to promote the scientific endeavor.
There is a need for better doctor education about adverse effects of medication and the commonly overlooked prescribing cascades.
Just let those $%^&*(@’s try it again. We won’t be marching in lockstep next time, it seems.
In 2026, decades-long delays between cancer signals and action are no longer defensible. In an era of unprecedented analytic power, the absence of a dedicated mechanism for rapid, independent signal validation represents a profound public health failure.
It’s not just happening on social media and mainstream media, but also in the high impact medical journals that our medical community rely upon. Inconvenient science is being heavily censored to protect profits. All at the expense of population health.
In these four areas – epidemiological, medical, ethical and democratic – principles were violated during the Covid-19 pandemic with dire consequences for health, basic freedoms, quality of life, education, business and the economy, and for democracy and society itself.
Microdosing doesn’t work, which is not surprising. It’s likely the same for other psychedelic drugs such as LSD, too.
Gain of function research ramps up with the support of the US military.
I trust that whatever lies beyond is not characterized by the vast stupidity and selfishness of what lies here: a stupidity and selfishness that lead many to abandon their right to their own sovereign selves.
Regulators insisted DNA contamination wasn’t there. Independent labs kept finding it. The difference came down to what regulators chose to measure — and what they didn’t.
Media who trumpeted alarmist paper go silent as it’s retracted.
Shortly after publication, Oncotarget became inaccessible, with the journal attributing the outage to an ongoing cyberattack that has been reported to the FBI.
The authors argue that these patterns raise questions about the assumption that human-produced CO2 is the dominant driver of global temperature change.