Does Big Tech Have a ‘Digital Duty of Care’?
That doesn’t mean we’re about to trust the government, though.
That doesn’t mean we’re about to trust the government, though.
Our media elites want everyone to have a very limited diet under their control. In their strange minds, losing control of the narrative is equated with the loss of democracy.
US election proves citizen journalism is the ‘new frontier for truth’, says Musk.
Snapchat has been identified as the most widely-used platform for online grooming, according to UK police data shared with the NSPCC, which reported over 7,000 offences of Sexual Communication with a Child across the UK by March 2024.
Musk might be the target here, but it’s the speech of all online users that groups like CCDH want to regulate. If too many shrug and consider ‘regulated’ speech the new norm, it will be easier for these regimes to censor more online content and people might gradually forget what an opinion is.
The left are no more leaving X than they were moving to Canada.
The panic can only be understood as a symptom of the legacy media being unable or unwilling to face the fact that they are no longer the main force influencing and controlling how the public sees the world.
There’s no doubt that certain kinds of online conduct are reprehensible. But that doesn’t mean we should disregard the First Amendment.
With the Biden-Harris administration silent in the face of the targeting of American platforms, Republicans are bringing forth legislation to combat foreign threats to domestic speech.
To find out, we need research – but it’s being manipulated by big tech itself.
The media are the biggest cry-bullies there are. They are wailing because Google is going to walk if they end up being taxed to protect failing media companies.
Kamala Harris is dog tucker the same way Jezebel was. Kammie the Side Chick will be around just long enough to pardon the Biden Crime Family.
Tor is the next step up and you should start using that too. It’s available for all platforms and devices.
At the very least, all of these financial arrangements need to be much more transparent in the public debate.
The decision to engage on social media should be made by parents, not the government.
It is stupid window dressing for laws that are already in effect and already ineffective.