Skip to content

Attendees at the G20 meetings in Bali last week put out a statement of intent that includes preparation for the next global pandemic.

Notably, pursuing high vaccination rates remains a priority, whereas saving lives through early treatment regimes (which were successful during the current pandemic) not so much.

[22] “We recognize that the extensive Covid-19 immunization is a global public good and we will advance our effort to ensure timely, equitable and universal access to safe, affordable, quality and effective vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics (VTDs).”

The second point of interest is the move towards international digital Covid-19 certificates to end lock downs by restricting the movements of the unvaccinated. No certificate, no travel.

[23] “We support

continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks

as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital Covid-19 certificates.”

Isn’t it great when Covid experts wander into health authority territory from a background in non-related fields, such as Indonesia’s MoH Budi Sadikin, an ex-banker, who presented the digital passport idea to G20 attendees?

Did anyone ask whether the failure of Covid vaccination programmes to stop the spread of the disease is a problem for future digital vaccination certificates?

Talk to any health expert about their vaccination programmes and they claim success – based on achieving high take-up rates!

Public acceptance of the programmes depended on convincing people the mRNA vaccine is just like traditional vaccines with the added selling point of amazing new technology, which, incidentally, is touted as de rigueur for future vaccines.

People bought into the concept; the sales patter worked particularly well because the mRNA vaccine delivery is the same as traditional vaccines.

“It’s worth noting that most, but not all, vaccines are given in the muscle – this is known as an intramuscular injection. Some vaccines, like the rotavirus vaccine, are given orally. Others are given just beneath the skin, or subcutaneously – think of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. However, many others are given in the muscle.

“Muscles make an excellent vaccine administration site because muscle tissue contains important immune cells. These immune cells recognize the antigen, a tiny piece of a virus or bacteria introduced by the vaccine that stimulates an immune response.”

But the road to highly vaccinated populations was fuelled by lies.

Lie number one

mRNA vaccine works in the same way as traditional vaccine.

It doesn’t. Traditional vaccines contain weakened or partial fragments of the pathogen (bacterium, virus, parasite or fungus) causing disease. The immune system recognises the foreign protein and reacts by producing an antibody response and effectively training itself for future attacks. Simple and effective.

Once the body produces antibodies in its primary response to an antigen, it also creates antibody-producing memory cells, which remain alive even after the pathogen is defeated by the antibodies.

If the body is exposed to the same pathogen more than once, the antibody response is much faster and more effective than the first time around because the memory cells are at the ready to pump out antibodies against that antigen.

World Health Organisation

That explains why some people won’t stop at two Covid vaccinations, opting for more boosters as they become available, based on the traditional ’flu vaccine that changes seasonally.

Lie number two

The injected mRNA remains at the injection site, or close to it.

In the case of the Covid-19 vaccine, it is not introducing an antigen but rather administering the blueprint for producing antigens. The immune cells in the muscle tissue pick up these antigens and present them to the lymph nodes. Injecting the vaccine into muscle tissue keeps the vaccine localized, allowing immune cells to sound the alarm to other immune cells and get to work.

Britannica

The spike protein has been found to travel throughout the body, replicating inside cells. It breaches the cell wall to use the cell’s biochemical machinery to build new virus particles that continue to spread to other cells and individuals.

In order to gain entry to the inside of the cell, enveloped viruses use proteins (or glycoproteins as they are frequently covered in slippery sugar molecules) to fuse their own membrane to that of cells and take over the cell.

The spike protein of coronaviruses is one such viral glycoprotein. Ebola viruses have one, the influenza virus has two and herpes simplex virus has five.

The Conversation

Despite carrying the same warning of possible pain at the injection site as traditional vaccine, the mRNA spike protein spreads spectacularly using the body’s blood supply. No part of the body is safe, it even crosses the blood-brain barrier, resulting in spike protein everywhere – in the the reproductive organs, the heart, the brain, the digestive system and even breast milk. Anyway blood can go, it can go.

No one knows how long it stays in important organs, how long it will keep reproducing or what the long-term effects will be.

Lie number three

The vaccine is safe.

Voluntary adverse event reporting sites like VAERS in the US and CARM in NZ list known side effects including myocarditis and pericarditis. The body’s response to damage done by the spike protein is to produce tiny blood clots only visible using a D-dimer test, or a blood test for elevated troponin levels indicating damage to the heart muscle.

Lie number four

The vaccine is effective.

A Pfizer representative testifying recently in the European court admitted Pfizer never tested the vaccine to see if it halts Covid transmission. As vaccination numbers rose, so did the number of Covid cases. Getting vaccinated to save granny was a lie.

Lie number five

Vaccination provides better protection than natural infection.

In general, UK health commentator Dr John Campbell is pro-vaccines but he says recovery from Covid infection provides an immune aspect that vaccination does not: mucosal compartment immunity, which is instrumental in preventing subsequent infection. Naturally Big Pharma is now working on a nasal spray to deliver vaccines and hopefully trigger mucosal compartment immunity.

Scientists examining the effects of mRNA vaccine made the following deductions:

  • The spike protein is neurotoxic;
  • It impairs DNA repair mechanisms;
  • It interferes with innate immunity;
  • It potentially gives increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer; and
  • It has unpredictable, complex effects in the body.
The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent.

The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.

Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites.

We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.

We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.

Science Direct paper abstract on mRNA Vaccine Immune Suppression June 2022

Latest