Table of Contents
As the old saying goes, who watches the watchers? Because, as it turns out, the nanny-state globalists who want to watch over everything we do on the internet need plenty of watching themselves. As do the same e-karens and nanny-staters who continually finger-wag the rest of us workin’ folk.
A United Nations judge has been convicted of forcing a young woman to work as a slave.
Prosecutors said Lydia Mugambe “took advantage of her status” over her victim by preventing her from holding down steady employment while forcing her to work as her maid and provide childcare for free.
She’s also a High Court judge in Uganda. But at least, I suppose, she wasn’t going in to bat for genocidal Rwandan war criminals.
But she’s shocked, shocked I tell you, that, as a card-carrying member of the globalist ‘human rights’ elite, she’s being held to account like some sort of peasant.
In footage released by Thames Valley Police, Mugambe appeared shocked when an officer said he was arresting her under the Modern Slavery Act.
She then had a conversation with the officer, in which she said: “I am a judge in my country, I even have immunity. I am not a criminal.”
Asked to reaffirm that she had immunity, Mugambe told the officer: “Yes, I have a diplomatic passport.”
For once, the corrupt UN lived up to its own standards.
“Any immunity Mugambe may have enjoyed as a UN judge has been waived by the Office of the United Nations Secretary General.”
If, on the other hand, she’d massacred and raped Jews, no doubt the UN would have not just protected, but promoted her.
No doubt you’ll be as shocked as I was to learn that a prominent ‘anti-fascist’ activist is yet another elite child molester.
A former Labour councillor who suddenly stepped down from his role with no explanation in April last year has pleaded guilty to sex offences against a 13-year-old girl.
Liron Velleman, 30, admitted one count of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child and attempting to cause a child aged 13 to 15 to watch or look at an image of sexual activity.
Between December 3 and 10, 2024, Velleman, who was elected as a Labour councillor for Barnet’s Whetstone ward in 2022, sent the 13-year-old girl naked pictures of himself and asked whether she was ‘at home alone’.
In the end, he was caught out in a police catfishing operation.
He then tried the ‘Terry Martin defence’.
During a hearing on January 2, Velleman’s defence barrister, Ali Hussein, told Highbury Magistrates’ Court his client had been diagnosed with depression, for which he had been prescribed medication.
Terry Martin is a former Tasmanian Labor politician who was caught as just one of hundreds of men who raped a 12-year-old girl, after her mother pimped her out. Martin claimed he thought she was 18 and blamed his offending on a Parkinson’s drug he was on at the time. Martin escaped jail time.
In a statement released today, advocacy group Hope Not Hate, where Velleman worked as a junior employee until early 2023, said: ‘HOPE not hate fully condemn these heinous crimes and believe that he should rightfully be punished under the full force of the law.’
It added: ‘HOPE not hate has had no contact with Velleman since before his arrest.’
Is that good enough, though? Shouldn’t HOPE Not Hate be held to their own lofty standards?
After all, just a few weeks ago, HOPE Not Hate tried to smear conservative politician Toby Young, because, 25 years ago, he sent two – count ’em two – innocuous emails to Ghislaine Maxwell.
This was in spite of the fact that I told the ‘journalist’ writing the piece – Patrik Hermansson – that I’d never met Epstein, never spoken to him, never emailed him, never traded messages with him, never been to any of his homes, never been on the Lolita Express, never been to Paedo Island, etc, etc. Nevertheless, according to HOPE Not Hate, the fact that I’d emailed his ex-girlfriend twice, 25 and 24 years ago, meant I now needed to be investigated.
According to the pro-censorship lobby group’s own logic, shouldn’t all its employees and volunteers, who have a much closer link to this convicted sex offender than I ever did with Epstein, now be investigated?
Doesn’t this mean, then, that HOPE Not Hate are ‘associated with’ a paedophile’s ‘circle’? How many emails did Velleman exchange with the bullies of HOPE Not Hate?
Doesn’t this mean that Hermansson, not to mention [Editor Nick Lowles], are in the “circle” of a convicted paedophile? I’m not suggesting they’ve also committed child sexual offences, just that the smear tactics they’ve used against me could just as easily be used to attack them.
Don’t be silly: this is the left. They can never, ever be expected to be held to their own standards.
